FY2024 source-reconciled actuarial data · Public Plans Database

Massachusetts Teachers Retirement Board

The Public Plans Database's 23-year record for Massachusetts Teachers Retirement Board: funded ratio, unfunded liability, member counts, and investment returns, compiled by Boston College CRR and cross-checked against actuarial valuations.

By · · Massachusetts · Teachers Plan · Data through FY2024

Funded Ratio: 60.4% (Under-funded) Massachusetts Teachers Retirement Board funded ratio compared to national public pension benchmark. FUNDED RATIO 60.4% Under-funded Nat'l avg 75.49869791666667% 0% 60 70 80 100% Healthy > 80% · At-risk 70-80% · Critical < 60%
Massachusetts Teachers Retirement Board funded ratio is 60.4 percent, classified as Under-funded. National public-pension benchmark is 75.49869791666667 percent.
Actuarial funded ratio
60.4%
Health grade
CReported funded ratio below full funding
Actuarial assets
$39.08B
Members
172,055

According to the Public Plans Database, compiled by the Boston College Center for Retirement Research, Massachusetts Teachers Retirement Board is one of 197 public pension plans tracked nationwide. The plan card reports source-reconciled actuarial figures through FY2024; the multi-year table includes only years whose reported ratio ties to its actuarial dollars. This site’s database copy was last loaded in July 2026. See our methodology for the full source and update cadence.

Sliding funded-ratio path

Massachusetts Teachers Retirement Board lost 18.8 points from FY2001 (79.2%) to FY2024 (60.4%) on the reconciled series.

Massachusetts Teachers Retirement Board on a sliding funded path

According to the Public Plans Database, Massachusetts Teachers Retirement Board lost 18.8 points on the reconciled series from FY2001 to FY2024, and now reports 60.4% (grade C).

60.4%
Funded · #86 of 192
C
Health grade
$25.59B
Actuarial unfunded liability
-18.8pp
FY2001→FY2024
Subscribe to funded-ratio changes (RSS)

Actuarial Unfunded Liability

$25.59B

Very large unfunded liability · source-reported UAAL

Total Members

172,055

active + retired + vested

1-Year Return

7.3%

Above assumed rate · net investment return

-1.8pp vs 5-yr avg

5-Year Avg Return

9.1%

Above assumed rate · annualized, net of fees

F
Composite Health Score
29/100
Massachusetts Teachers Retirement Board

Transparent derived index from public pension-plan filings, not an official rating. A 4-dimension composite (funded ratio, contribution discipline, 5-year investment return, unfunded burden), each scored against this dataset's own percentile distribution across 197 reporting plans. Not the same as the plan's headline funded-ratio grade above. See the exact dimensions, weights, and formula.

Funded Ratio F
60.4%
Actuarial assets as a share of liabilities
Contribution Discipline F
100.0%
Share of the actuarially required contribution actually paid
Investment Returns B
9.1%
5-year annualized investment return
Unfunded Burden F
38.8%
Unfunded liability as a share of total obligations
How this score is calculated (benchmark table)
Dimension P10 P25 P50 P75 P90 Weight
Funded ratio (higher = better) 57.6% 67.2% 75.0% 87.0% 97.6% 0.35
Contribution discipline (ARC) (higher = better) 88.4% 100.0% 100.0% 104.1% 122.1% 0.25
5yr investment return (higher = better) 6.4% 7.5% 8.3% 9.1% 9.9% 0.20
Unfunded burden (lower = better) 2.0% 12.7% 25.0% 33.1% 42.4% 0.20

Percentiles computed across all 197 plans in this database with a reported value for that metric (2026-09-09). A dimension a plan does not report drops out of its composite, and that weight redistributes across the dimensions it does report, so thin reporting never silently lowers a score relative to a fully-reported peer.

Participant Composition

Participants: 101.3K active, 70.8K retired, 0 separated Plan participant breakdown showing active workers, retirees, and separated-vested members. PARTICIPANT MIX 172.1K total members 59% 41% Active 101.3K Retired 70.8K Separated 0 Active-to-Retiree 1.43 · Transitioning
Plan participant breakdown: 101.3K active workers, 70.8K retirees, 0 separated-vested members. Sustainability rating: Transitioning.

Investment Policy Mix

Asset Allocation: 55% equity, 25% fixed income, 17% alternatives Massachusetts Teachers Retirement Board investment policy mix as reported in its CAFR and actuarial valuation. ASSET ALLOCATION $40.4B market assets · CAFR / actuarial valuation 55% 25% 17% Equity 55.0% Fixed Inc. 25.0% Alternatives 17.0% Cash 3.0% Investment Stance: Growth-Tilted · Equity + Alts 72%
Massachusetts Teachers Retirement Board asset allocation: 55% equity, 25% fixed income, 17% alternatives, 3% cash. Investment stance: Growth-Tilted.

Funded ratio, 2001 to 2024

Assets as a share of the benefits already promised, one point per reported year. Down 18.8 points across the series. This is the multi-year table's series, so its last point can be a later year than the plan card above, which reports the plan's own latest valuation.

50%60%70%80%90% 200120042007201020132016201920232024 60.4%

What changed, FY2023 to FY2024

1.8 pts funded ratio

Massachusetts Teachers Retirement Board's funded ratio rose 1.8 points from FY2023 to FY2024, with assets contributing +4.1 points and the accrued liability contributing -2.3.

Funded ratio
58.7% → 60.4%
Actuarial assets
$36.54B → $39.08B (+7.0%)
Accrued liability
$62.29B → $64.67B (+3.8%)
Where the 1.8-point move came from
Assets
+4.1 pts
Accrued liability
-2.3 pts

Accrued liability is the source-reported value for benefits already promised. The two contributions are the move the ratio would have made on the prior year’s liability (assets) and the remainder (liability); they sum to the total by construction. Both years shown provide source-reconciled actuarial assets and liability, so neither figure rests on a ratio published on its own. Source: Public Plans Database (Boston College CRR / NASRA), loaded July 2026. See our funding-change board for how this plan’s move compares with the rest of the dataset.

Historical Actuarial Funding

Year Actuarial Ratio
2024 60.4%
2023 58.7%
2022 59.0%
2021 53.0%
2019 51.7%
2018 52.4%
2017 52.1%
2016 52.8%
2015 54.3%
2014 56.3%
2013 55.7%
2012 60.7%
2011 66.3%
2010 63.0%
2009 58.2%
2008 73.9%
2007 71.0%
2006 67.2%
2005 67.6%
2004 69.6%

What the Data Says About Massachusetts Teachers Retirement Board

Massachusetts Teachers Retirement Board is funded above the midpoint but still carries a real shortfall, 15 points below the 75.5% national average across tracked plans. A 5-year average investment return of 9.1% factors into the plan's overall trajectory.

For Massachusetts taxpayers and plan members, the $25.59B source-reported actuarial unfunded liability is the shortfall this plan must close over time.

Where this data comes from + how funding gaps get resolved

These figures come from the Public Plans Database, a collaboration between the Boston College Center for Retirement Research and NASRA that compiles them from each plan's Comprehensive Annual Financial Reports (CAFRs) and actuarial valuations. The relationship between contribution adequacy and investment performance determines whether an unfunded liability narrows or expands year over year, and the gap itself is typically closed through some combination of higher contributions, investment returns, or benefit modifications. See our methodology for how public-pension funding differs from ERISA-backed private plans, and our disclaimer below before acting on this data.

Membership

101,286
Active Members
70,769
Retirees
172,055
Total Members

Plan Details

Plan Type
Teachers
Market Assets
$40.42B
Source: Public Plans Database (PPD)
Boston College CRR / NASRA

Plans With a Similar Funded Ratio

The closest plans nationwide to Massachusetts Teachers Retirement Board's 75.8% funded ratio.

Showing 5 of 191 plans nationwide with a reported funded ratio.

Every figure on PlainPension is rendered directly from the Public Plans Database (Boston College Center for Retirement Research), no number is typed in by an editor. Massachusetts Teachers Retirement Board ranks #86 of 192 by funded ratio and #51 of 190 by membership. This information is for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice, consult a qualified professional before acting on it. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the typed corrections pathway, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of July 2026.