FY2024 source-reconciled actuarial data · Public Plans Database

Greenville Fire Pension Plan

A full financial snapshot of Greenville Fire Pension Plan: funded ratio, unfunded liability, member counts, and investment returns, drawn from 23 years of history in the Public Plans Database (Boston College CRR) and verified against actuarial valuations.

By · · South Carolina · Police & Fire Plan · Data through FY2024

Funded Ratio: 88.1% (Healthy) Greenville Fire Pension Plan funded ratio compared to national public pension benchmark. FUNDED RATIO 88.1% Healthy Nat'l avg 75.49869791666667% 0% 60 70 80 100% Healthy > 80% · At-risk 70-80% · Critical < 60%
Greenville Fire Pension Plan funded ratio is 88.1 percent, classified as Healthy. National public-pension benchmark is 75.49869791666667 percent.
Actuarial funded ratio
88.1%
Health grade
CReported funded ratio below full funding
Actuarial assets
$72M
Members
283

According to the Public Plans Database, compiled by the Boston College Center for Retirement Research, Greenville Fire Pension Plan is one of 197 public pension plans tracked nationwide. The plan card reports source-reconciled actuarial figures through FY2024; the multi-year table includes only years whose reported ratio ties to its actuarial dollars. This site’s database copy was last loaded in July 2026. See our methodology for the full source and update cadence.

Smaller membership book

Greenville Fire Pension Plan ranks #189 of 190 by reported members (283), bottom-third membership book among plans with a count.

Greenville Fire Pension Plan in the smaller-membership third

According to the Public Plans Database, Greenville Fire Pension Plan carries a bottom-third membership book (283, #189 of 190) with a 88.1% actuarial funded ratio (grade C).

88.1%
Funded · #137 of 192
C
Health grade
283
Members · #189 of 190
-6.9pp
FY2001→FY2024
Subscribe to funded-ratio changes (RSS)

Actuarial Unfunded Liability

$10M

Modest unfunded liability · source-reported UAAL

Total Members

283

active + retired + vested

1-Year Return

10.0%

Strong return year · net investment return

2.5pp vs 5-yr avg

5-Year Avg Return

7.5%

Above assumed rate · annualized, net of fees

C-
Composite Health Score
54/100
Greenville Fire Pension Plan

Transparent derived index from public pension-plan filings, not an official rating. A 4-dimension composite (funded ratio, contribution discipline, 5-year investment return, unfunded burden), each scored against this dataset's own percentile distribution across 197 reporting plans. Not the same as the plan's headline funded-ratio grade above. See the exact dimensions, weights, and formula.

Funded Ratio B+
88.1%
Actuarial assets as a share of liabilities
Contribution Discipline F
100.0%
Share of the actuarially required contribution actually paid
Investment Returns F
7.5%
5-year annualized investment return
Unfunded Burden B+
11.9%
Unfunded liability as a share of total obligations
How this score is calculated (benchmark table)
Dimension P10 P25 P50 P75 P90 Weight
Funded ratio (higher = better) 57.6% 67.2% 75.0% 87.0% 97.6% 0.35
Contribution discipline (ARC) (higher = better) 88.4% 100.0% 100.0% 104.1% 122.1% 0.25
5yr investment return (higher = better) 6.4% 7.5% 8.3% 9.1% 9.9% 0.20
Unfunded burden (lower = better) 2.0% 12.7% 25.0% 33.1% 42.4% 0.20

Percentiles computed across all 197 plans in this database with a reported value for that metric (2026-09-09). A dimension a plan does not report drops out of its composite, and that weight redistributes across the dimensions it does report, so thin reporting never silently lowers a score relative to a fully-reported peer.

Participant Composition

Participants: 140 active, 123 retired, 0 separated Plan participant breakdown showing active workers, retirees, and separated-vested members. PARTICIPANT MIX 283 total members 49% 43% Active 140 Retired 123 Separated 0 Active-to-Retiree 1.14 · Transitioning
Plan participant breakdown: 140 active workers, 123 retirees, 0 separated-vested members. Sustainability rating: Transitioning.

Investment Policy Mix

Asset Allocation: 55% equity, 25% fixed income, 17% alternatives Greenville Fire Pension Plan investment policy mix as reported in its CAFR and actuarial valuation. ASSET ALLOCATION $72M market assets · CAFR / actuarial valuation 55% 25% 17% Equity 55.0% Fixed Inc. 25.0% Alternatives 17.0% Cash 3.0% Investment Stance: Growth-Tilted · Equity + Alts 72%
Greenville Fire Pension Plan asset allocation: 55% equity, 25% fixed income, 17% alternatives, 3% cash. Investment stance: Growth-Tilted.

Funded ratio, 2001 to 2024

Assets as a share of the benefits already promised, one point per reported year. Down 6.9 points across the series. This is the multi-year table's series, so its last point can be a later year than the plan card above, which reports the plan's own latest valuation.

70%80%90%100%110%120% 20012005200820112016201920222024 88.1%

What changed, FY2023 to FY2024

2.1 pts funded ratio

Greenville Fire Pension Plan's funded ratio fell 2.1 points from FY2023 to FY2024, with assets contributing +10.8 points and the accrued liability contributing -12.9.

Funded ratio
90.2% → 88.1%
Actuarial assets
$64M → $72M (+12.0%)
Accrued liability
$71M → $81M (+14.7%)
Where the 2.1-point move came from
Assets
+10.8 pts
Accrued liability
-12.9 pts

Accrued liability is the source-reported value for benefits already promised. The two contributions are the move the ratio would have made on the prior year’s liability (assets) and the remainder (liability); they sum to the total by construction. Both years shown provide source-reconciled actuarial assets and liability, so neither figure rests on a ratio published on its own. Source: Public Plans Database (Boston College CRR / NASRA), loaded July 2026. See our funding-change board for how this plan’s move compares with the rest of the dataset.

Historical Actuarial Funding

Year Actuarial Ratio
2024 88.1%
2023 90.2%
2022 86.1%
2021 109.2%
2020 89.4%
2019 88.1%
2018 85.2%
2017 85.3%
2016 81.0%
2013 86.2%
2012 82.7%
2011 85.7%
2010 79.3%
2009 75.2%
2008 91.4%
2007 100.3%
2006 91.2%
2005 90.1%
2003 90.6%
2002 94.2%

What the Data Says About Greenville Fire Pension Plan

Greenville Fire Pension Plan ranks among the better-funded plans in the database, 13 points above the 75.5% national average across tracked plans. A 5-year average investment return of 7.5% factors into the plan's overall trajectory.

For South Carolina taxpayers and plan members, the $10M source-reported actuarial unfunded liability is the shortfall this plan must close over time.

Where this data comes from + how funding gaps get resolved

These figures come from the Public Plans Database, a collaboration between the Boston College Center for Retirement Research and NASRA that compiles them from each plan's Comprehensive Annual Financial Reports (CAFRs) and actuarial valuations. The relationship between contribution adequacy and investment performance determines whether an unfunded liability narrows or expands year over year, and the gap itself is typically closed through some combination of higher contributions, investment returns, or benefit modifications. See our methodology for how public-pension funding differs from ERISA-backed private plans, and our disclaimer below before acting on this data.

Membership

140
Active Members
123
Retirees
283
Total Members

Plan Details

Plan Type
Police & Fire
Market Assets
$72M
Source: Public Plans Database (PPD)
Boston College CRR / NASRA

Plans With a Similar Funded Ratio

The closest plans nationwide to Greenville Fire Pension Plan's 68.6% funded ratio.

Showing 5 of 191 plans nationwide with a reported funded ratio.

Every figure on PlainPension is rendered directly from the Public Plans Database (Boston College Center for Retirement Research), no number is typed in by an editor. Greenville Fire Pension Plan ranks #137 of 192 by funded ratio and #189 of 190 by membership. This information is for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice, consult a qualified professional before acting on it. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the typed corrections pathway, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of July 2026.