Plan
Atlanta General Employees Pension Fund
State
Georgia
Funded Ratio
69.9%
Assets
$1.73B
Members
10,431
Health Grade: C — Underfunded — significant gap between assets and liabilities
FY2023 data Grade C Public Plans Database

Atlanta General Employees Pension Fund

Funded ratio, unfunded liability, member counts, ARC coverage, and 23-year financial history for Atlanta General Employees Pension Fund — sourced from the Public Plans Database (Boston College CRR) and cross-checked against actuarial valuations.

Funded Ratio: 69.9% (Under-funded) Atlanta General Employees Pension Fund funded ratio compared to national public pension benchmark. FUNDED RATIO 69.9% Under-funded Nat'l avg 73.5% 0% 60 70 80 100% Healthy > 80% · At-risk 70-80% · Critical < 60%
Atlanta General Employees Pension Fund funded ratio is 69.9 percent — classified as Under-funded. National public-pension benchmark is 73.5 percent.
C
Financial Health Grade
Underfunded — significant gap between assets and liabilities

Funded Ratio

69.9%

actuarial assets / liabilities

Unfunded Liability

$746M

actuarial shortfall

Total Members

10,431

active + retired + vested

1-Year Return

9.6%

net investment return

2.0pp vs 5-yr avg

5-Year Avg Return

7.6%

annualized, net of fees

ARC Payment

44.9%

of actuarially required contribution

How Atlanta General Employees Pension Fund Funded Ratio Compares

Plan Funded Ratio 69.9%
National avg

A ratio of 69.9% compared against the national public-pension average of 73.5%.

Healthy Threshold

Plans above 80% are generally considered adequately funded by NASRA standards.

Participant Composition

Participants: 4.5K active, 5.6K retired, 0 separated Plan participant breakdown showing active workers, retirees, and separated-vested members. PARTICIPANT MIX 10.4K total members 43% 53% Active 4.5K Retired 5.6K Separated 0 Active-to-Retiree 0.81 · Mature / At Risk
Plan participant breakdown: 4.5K active workers, 5.6K retirees, 0 separated-vested members. Sustainability rating: Mature / At Risk.

The active-to-retiree ratio is a leading indicator of long-term plan sustainability — plans with more retirees than active contributors face mounting cash-flow pressure as benefit payments outpace incoming contributions.

Investment Policy Mix

Asset Allocation: 55% equity, 25% fixed income, 17% alternatives Atlanta General Employees Pension Fund investment policy mix as reported in Form 5500 Schedule H disclosures. ASSET ALLOCATION $1.7B market assets · Form 5500 Schedule H 55% 25% 17% Equity 55.0% Fixed Inc. 25.0% Alternatives 17.0% Cash 3.0% Investment Stance: Growth-Tilted · Equity + Alts 72%
Atlanta General Employees Pension Fund asset allocation: 55% equity, 25% fixed income, 17% alternatives, 3% cash. Investment stance: Growth-Tilted.

Public pension plans report their asset allocation in Form 5500 Schedule H Part I disclosures. Equity-heavy mixes capture market upside but introduce volatility; fixed-income tilts protect funded status during downturns at the cost of long-run return.

Historical Funded Ratio

Year Funded Ratio
2024 69.9%
2023 68.6%
2022 69.2%
2021 67.1%
2020 64.4%
2019 64.8%
2018 65.1%
2017 63.2%
2016 63.4%
2015 62.4%
2014 60.8%
2013 61.1%
2012 60.5%
2011 60.8%
2010 62.7%
2009 66.1%
2008 72.3%
2007 75.7%
2006 75.6%
2005 86.1%

What the Data Says About Atlanta General Employees Pension Fund

Atlanta General Employees Pension Fund reports a funded ratio of 69.9% as of fiscal year 2023, earning a financial health grade of C in the Public Plans Database. The plan holds $1.73B in market assets against an unfunded liability of $746M. As a General State plan operating under Georgia sponsorship, it covers 10,431 members (4,526 active contributors, 5,565 retirees drawing benefits). These figures aggregate from Form 5500 filings submitted to the Department of Labor and actuarial valuations reported through NASRA.

A funded ratio in the 60–80% range indicates moderate underfunding that falls near the national average of 72–75% but leaves the plan exposed to market downturns and demographic shifts. Employer contributions covered 44.9% of the Annual Required Contribution in the most recent reporting cycle, while the plan posted a 5-year average investment return of 7.6%. The relationship between contribution adequacy and investment performance determines whether the unfunded liability narrows or expands year over year.

For Georgia taxpayers and plan members, the $746M unfunded gap represents the actuarial shortfall that must eventually be closed through a combination of contributions, investment returns, or benefit modifications. Unlike private-sector pensions governed by ERISA and backstopped by the PBGC, public plans like Atlanta General Employees Pension Fund rely on the full faith and credit of Georgia — meaning funding shortfalls flow through to state and local budgets rather than a federal insurance program. This information summarizes official Public Plans Database disclosures and is provided for research and educational purposes only. It is not financial, legal, or retirement-planning advice; active and retired members with specific benefit questions should consult their plan administrator directly.

Membership

4,526
Active Members
5,565
Retirees
10,431
Total Members

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Atlanta General Employees Pension Fund fully funded?

Atlanta General Employees Pension Fund has a funded ratio of 69.9% as of FY2023, earning a health grade of C. A funded ratio of 100% means the plan has enough assets to cover all projected liabilities. Ratios above 80% are generally considered adequately funded; ratios below 60% indicate significant underfunding and risk to future benefits.

What happens if Atlanta General Employees Pension Fund runs out of money?

Public pension plans like Atlanta General Employees Pension Fund are backed by the sponsoring government entity — in this case Georgia. If a plan's assets are insufficient, the state or local government is typically required to make up the difference through increased contributions, benefit adjustments, or tax measures. Unlike private pensions, public pensions are not insured by the PBGC, but they do carry the full faith and credit of the sponsoring government.

What does a funded ratio of 69.9% mean?

A funded ratio of 69.9% means that Atlanta General Employees Pension Fund currently has assets equal to 69.9% of its projected benefit obligations. The unfunded liability — the gap between assets and liabilities — stands at $746M. This represents a moderate funding gap that requires ongoing monitoring.

How does Atlanta General Employees Pension Fund compare to other public pensions?

Atlanta General Employees Pension Fund is a General State plan in Georgia serving 10,431 members. Nationally, the average funded ratio for public pension plans tracked by the Public Plans Database is approximately 72–75%. Atlanta General Employees Pension Fund's funded ratio of 69.9% places it near the national average.

How many members does Atlanta General Employees Pension Fund have?

Atlanta General Employees Pension Fund covers 10,431 total members, including 4,526 active employees and 5,565 retirees currently receiving benefits. The ratio of active members to retirees is a key indicator of plan sustainability — when the number of retirees grows relative to active contributors, funding pressure increases.

What is the ARC payment percentage for Atlanta General Employees Pension Fund?

Atlanta General Employees Pension Fund pays 44.9% of its Annual Required Contribution (ARC). Consistently underpaying the ARC accelerates the growth of unfunded liabilities and places future benefits at greater risk. Employer contribution patterns are tracked annually in the Public Plans Database.

Related

Data sourced from official Public Plans Database and actuarial valuations from federal and state pension systems. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by Kiznis Studio Editorial

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the Public Plans Database (PPD). Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.

All federal data sources used on this page