Plan
Georgia Employees Retirement System
State
Georgia
Funded Ratio
56.9%
Assets
$17.91B
Members
454,048
Health Grade: D — Severely underfunded — facing funding crisis
FY2023 data Grade D Public Plans Database

Georgia Employees Retirement System

Funded ratio, unfunded liability, member counts, ARC coverage, and 23-year financial history for Georgia Employees Retirement System — sourced from the Public Plans Database (Boston College CRR) and cross-checked against actuarial valuations.

Funded Ratio: 56.9% (Critical) Georgia Employees Retirement System funded ratio compared to national public pension benchmark. FUNDED RATIO 56.9% Critical Nat'l avg 73.5% 0% 60 70 80 100% Healthy > 80% · At-risk 70-80% · Critical < 60%
Georgia Employees Retirement System funded ratio is 56.9 percent — classified as Critical. National public-pension benchmark is 73.5 percent.
D
Financial Health Grade
Severely underfunded — facing funding crisis

Funded Ratio

56.9%

actuarial assets / liabilities

Unfunded Liability

$13.56B

actuarial shortfall

Total Members

454,048

active + retired + vested

1-Year Return

18.3%

net investment return

3.6pp vs 5-yr avg

5-Year Avg Return

14.7%

annualized, net of fees

ARC Payment

7.6%

of actuarially required contribution

How Georgia Employees Retirement System Funded Ratio Compares

Plan Funded Ratio 56.9%
National avg

A ratio of 56.9% compared against the national public-pension average of 73.5%.

Healthy Threshold

Plans above 80% are generally considered adequately funded by NASRA standards.

Participant Composition

Participants: 114.9K active, 77.3K retired, 0 separated Plan participant breakdown showing active workers, retirees, and separated-vested members. PARTICIPANT MIX 454.0K total members 25% 17% Active 114.9K Retired 77.3K Separated 0 Active-to-Retiree 1.49 · Transitioning
Plan participant breakdown: 114.9K active workers, 77.3K retirees, 0 separated-vested members. Sustainability rating: Transitioning.

The active-to-retiree ratio is a leading indicator of long-term plan sustainability — plans with more retirees than active contributors face mounting cash-flow pressure as benefit payments outpace incoming contributions.

Investment Policy Mix

Asset Allocation: 55% equity, 25% fixed income, 17% alternatives Georgia Employees Retirement System investment policy mix as reported in Form 5500 Schedule H disclosures. ASSET ALLOCATION $17.9B market assets · Form 5500 Schedule H 55% 25% 17% Equity 55.0% Fixed Inc. 25.0% Alternatives 17.0% Cash 3.0% Investment Stance: Growth-Tilted · Equity + Alts 72%
Georgia Employees Retirement System asset allocation: 55% equity, 25% fixed income, 17% alternatives, 3% cash. Investment stance: Growth-Tilted.

Public pension plans report their asset allocation in Form 5500 Schedule H Part I disclosures. Equity-heavy mixes capture market upside but introduce volatility; fixed-income tilts protect funded status during downturns at the cost of long-run return.

Historical Funded Ratio

Year Funded Ratio
2023 N/A
2022 N/A
2021 N/A
2020 N/A
2019 N/A
2018 N/A
2017 N/A
2016 N/A
2015 N/A
2014 56.9%
2013 54.0%
2012 63.4%
2011 73.2%
2010 81.7%
2009 76.5%
2008 82.1%
2007 86.8%
2006 84.1%
2005 86.3%
2004 91.8%

What the Data Says About Georgia Employees Retirement System

Georgia Employees Retirement System reports a funded ratio of 56.9% as of fiscal year 2023, earning a financial health grade of D in the Public Plans Database. The plan holds $17.91B in market assets against an unfunded liability of $13.56B. As a General State plan operating under Georgia sponsorship, it covers 454,048 members (114,906 active contributors, 77,339 retirees drawing benefits). These figures aggregate from Form 5500 filings submitted to the Department of Labor and actuarial valuations reported through NASRA.

A funded ratio below 60% reflects significant underfunding relative to the national average of 72–75%, which typically triggers escalating employer contributions or legislative reform conversations. Employer contributions covered 7.6% of the Annual Required Contribution in the most recent reporting cycle, while the plan posted a 5-year average investment return of 14.7%. The relationship between contribution adequacy and investment performance determines whether the unfunded liability narrows or expands year over year.

For Georgia taxpayers and plan members, the $13.56B unfunded gap represents the actuarial shortfall that must eventually be closed through a combination of contributions, investment returns, or benefit modifications. Unlike private-sector pensions governed by ERISA and backstopped by the PBGC, public plans like Georgia Employees Retirement System rely on the full faith and credit of Georgia — meaning funding shortfalls flow through to state and local budgets rather than a federal insurance program. This information summarizes official Public Plans Database disclosures and is provided for research and educational purposes only. It is not financial, legal, or retirement-planning advice; active and retired members with specific benefit questions should consult their plan administrator directly.

Membership

114,906
Active Members
77,339
Retirees
454,048
Total Members

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Georgia Employees Retirement System fully funded?

Georgia Employees Retirement System has a funded ratio of 56.9% as of FY2023, earning a health grade of D. A funded ratio of 100% means the plan has enough assets to cover all projected liabilities. Ratios above 80% are generally considered adequately funded; ratios below 60% indicate significant underfunding and risk to future benefits.

What happens if Georgia Employees Retirement System runs out of money?

Public pension plans like Georgia Employees Retirement System are backed by the sponsoring government entity — in this case Georgia. If a plan's assets are insufficient, the state or local government is typically required to make up the difference through increased contributions, benefit adjustments, or tax measures. Unlike private pensions, public pensions are not insured by the PBGC, but they do carry the full faith and credit of the sponsoring government.

What does a funded ratio of 56.9% mean?

A funded ratio of 56.9% means that Georgia Employees Retirement System currently has assets equal to 56.9% of its projected benefit obligations. The unfunded liability — the gap between assets and liabilities — stands at $13.56B. This level of underfunding typically requires corrective action such as increased contributions or benefit restructuring.

How does Georgia Employees Retirement System compare to other public pensions?

Georgia Employees Retirement System is a General State plan in Georgia serving 454,048 members. Nationally, the average funded ratio for public pension plans tracked by the Public Plans Database is approximately 72–75%. Georgia Employees Retirement System's funded ratio of 56.9% places it below the national average, indicating elevated fiscal pressure.

How many members does Georgia Employees Retirement System have?

Georgia Employees Retirement System covers 454,048 total members, including 114,906 active employees and 77,339 retirees currently receiving benefits. The ratio of active members to retirees is a key indicator of plan sustainability — when the number of retirees grows relative to active contributors, funding pressure increases.

What is the ARC payment percentage for Georgia Employees Retirement System?

Georgia Employees Retirement System pays 7.6% of its Annual Required Contribution (ARC). Consistently underpaying the ARC accelerates the growth of unfunded liabilities and places future benefits at greater risk. Employer contribution patterns are tracked annually in the Public Plans Database.

Related

Data sourced from official Public Plans Database and actuarial valuations from federal and state pension systems. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by Kiznis Studio Editorial

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the Public Plans Database (PPD). Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.

All federal data sources used on this page