Plan
New Hampshire Retirement System
State
New Hampshire
Funded Ratio
55.3%
Assets
$11.46B
Members
95,458
Health Grade: D — Severely underfunded — facing funding crisis
FY2023 data Grade D Public Plans Database

New Hampshire Retirement System

Funded ratio, unfunded liability, member counts, ARC coverage, and 23-year financial history for New Hampshire Retirement System — sourced from the Public Plans Database (Boston College CRR) and cross-checked against actuarial valuations.

Funded Ratio: 55.3% (Critical) New Hampshire Retirement System funded ratio compared to national public pension benchmark. FUNDED RATIO 55.3% Critical Nat'l avg 73.5% 0% 60 70 80 100% Healthy > 80% · At-risk 70-80% · Critical < 60%
New Hampshire Retirement System funded ratio is 55.3 percent — classified as Critical. National public-pension benchmark is 73.5 percent.
D
Financial Health Grade
Severely underfunded — facing funding crisis

Funded Ratio

55.3%

actuarial assets / liabilities

Unfunded Liability

$9.26B

actuarial shortfall

Total Members

95,458

active + retired + vested

1-Year Return

6.6%

net investment return

0.3pp vs 5-yr avg

5-Year Avg Return

6.3%

annualized, net of fees

ARC Payment

27.2%

of actuarially required contribution

How New Hampshire Retirement System Funded Ratio Compares

Plan Funded Ratio 55.3%
National avg

A ratio of 55.3% compared against the national public-pension average of 73.5%.

Healthy Threshold

Plans above 80% are generally considered adequately funded by NASRA standards.

Participant Composition

Participants: 48.6K active, 43.6K retired, 0 separated Plan participant breakdown showing active workers, retirees, and separated-vested members. PARTICIPANT MIX 95.5K total members 51% 46% Active 48.6K Retired 43.6K Separated 0 Active-to-Retiree 1.11 · Transitioning
Plan participant breakdown: 48.6K active workers, 43.6K retirees, 0 separated-vested members. Sustainability rating: Transitioning.

The active-to-retiree ratio is a leading indicator of long-term plan sustainability — plans with more retirees than active contributors face mounting cash-flow pressure as benefit payments outpace incoming contributions.

Investment Policy Mix

Asset Allocation: 55% equity, 25% fixed income, 17% alternatives New Hampshire Retirement System investment policy mix as reported in Form 5500 Schedule H disclosures. ASSET ALLOCATION $11.5B market assets · Form 5500 Schedule H 55% 25% 17% Equity 55.0% Fixed Inc. 25.0% Alternatives 17.0% Cash 3.0% Investment Stance: Growth-Tilted · Equity + Alts 72%
New Hampshire Retirement System asset allocation: 55% equity, 25% fixed income, 17% alternatives, 3% cash. Investment stance: Growth-Tilted.

Public pension plans report their asset allocation in Form 5500 Schedule H Part I disclosures. Equity-heavy mixes capture market upside but introduce volatility; fixed-income tilts protect funded status during downturns at the cost of long-run return.

Historical Funded Ratio

Year Funded Ratio
2024 55.3%
2023 57.6%
2022 57.7%
2021 59.0%
2020 61.1%
2019 62.9%
2018 64.9%
2017 67.5%
2016 69.6%
2015 75.0%
2014 75.1%
2013 72.7%
2012 73.2%
2011 79.2%
2010 80.4%
2009 83.0%
2008 85.9%
2007 86.8%
2006 85.3%
2005 84.9%

What the Data Says About New Hampshire Retirement System

New Hampshire Retirement System reports a funded ratio of 55.3% as of fiscal year 2023, earning a financial health grade of D in the Public Plans Database. The plan holds $11.46B in market assets against an unfunded liability of $9.26B. As a General State plan operating under New Hampshire sponsorship, it covers 95,458 members (48,589 active contributors, 43,603 retirees drawing benefits). These figures aggregate from Form 5500 filings submitted to the Department of Labor and actuarial valuations reported through NASRA.

A funded ratio below 60% reflects significant underfunding relative to the national average of 72–75%, which typically triggers escalating employer contributions or legislative reform conversations. Employer contributions covered 27.2% of the Annual Required Contribution in the most recent reporting cycle, while the plan posted a 5-year average investment return of 6.3%. The relationship between contribution adequacy and investment performance determines whether the unfunded liability narrows or expands year over year.

For New Hampshire taxpayers and plan members, the $9.26B unfunded gap represents the actuarial shortfall that must eventually be closed through a combination of contributions, investment returns, or benefit modifications. Unlike private-sector pensions governed by ERISA and backstopped by the PBGC, public plans like New Hampshire Retirement System rely on the full faith and credit of New Hampshire — meaning funding shortfalls flow through to state and local budgets rather than a federal insurance program. This information summarizes official Public Plans Database disclosures and is provided for research and educational purposes only. It is not financial, legal, or retirement-planning advice; active and retired members with specific benefit questions should consult their plan administrator directly.

Membership

48,589
Active Members
43,603
Retirees
95,458
Total Members

Frequently Asked Questions

Is New Hampshire Retirement System fully funded?

New Hampshire Retirement System has a funded ratio of 55.3% as of FY2023, earning a health grade of D. A funded ratio of 100% means the plan has enough assets to cover all projected liabilities. Ratios above 80% are generally considered adequately funded; ratios below 60% indicate significant underfunding and risk to future benefits.

What happens if New Hampshire Retirement System runs out of money?

Public pension plans like New Hampshire Retirement System are backed by the sponsoring government entity — in this case New Hampshire. If a plan's assets are insufficient, the state or local government is typically required to make up the difference through increased contributions, benefit adjustments, or tax measures. Unlike private pensions, public pensions are not insured by the PBGC, but they do carry the full faith and credit of the sponsoring government.

What does a funded ratio of 55.3% mean?

A funded ratio of 55.3% means that New Hampshire Retirement System currently has assets equal to 55.3% of its projected benefit obligations. The unfunded liability — the gap between assets and liabilities — stands at $9.26B. This level of underfunding typically requires corrective action such as increased contributions or benefit restructuring.

How does New Hampshire Retirement System compare to other public pensions?

New Hampshire Retirement System is a General State plan in New Hampshire serving 95,458 members. Nationally, the average funded ratio for public pension plans tracked by the Public Plans Database is approximately 72–75%. New Hampshire Retirement System's funded ratio of 55.3% places it below the national average, indicating elevated fiscal pressure.

How many members does New Hampshire Retirement System have?

New Hampshire Retirement System covers 95,458 total members, including 48,589 active employees and 43,603 retirees currently receiving benefits. The ratio of active members to retirees is a key indicator of plan sustainability — when the number of retirees grows relative to active contributors, funding pressure increases.

What is the ARC payment percentage for New Hampshire Retirement System?

New Hampshire Retirement System pays 27.2% of its Annual Required Contribution (ARC). Consistently underpaying the ARC accelerates the growth of unfunded liabilities and places future benefits at greater risk. Employer contribution patterns are tracked annually in the Public Plans Database.

Related

Data sourced from official Public Plans Database and actuarial valuations from federal and state pension systems. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by Kiznis Studio Editorial

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the Public Plans Database (PPD). Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.

All federal data sources used on this page