Plan
Manchester Employees' Contributory Retirement System
State
New Hampshire
Funded Ratio
96.3%
Assets
$274M
Members
2,333
Health Grade: B — Adequately funded — meeting most funding benchmarks
FY2023 data Grade B Public Plans Database

Manchester Employees' Contributory Retirement System

Funded ratio, unfunded liability, member counts, ARC coverage, and 23-year financial history for Manchester Employees' Contributory Retirement System — sourced from the Public Plans Database (Boston College CRR) and cross-checked against actuarial valuations.

Funded Ratio: 96.3% (Healthy) Manchester Employees' Contributory Retirement System funded ratio compared to national public pension benchmark. FUNDED RATIO 96.3% Healthy Nat'l avg 73.5% 0% 60 70 80 100% Healthy > 80% · At-risk 70-80% · Critical < 60%
Manchester Employees' Contributory Retirement System funded ratio is 96.3 percent — classified as Healthy. National public-pension benchmark is 73.5 percent.
B
Financial Health Grade
Adequately funded — meeting most funding benchmarks

Funded Ratio

96.3%

actuarial assets / liabilities

Unfunded Liability

$11M

actuarial shortfall

Total Members

2,333

active + retired + vested

1-Year Return

9.2%

net investment return

1.0pp vs 5-yr avg

5-Year Avg Return

8.2%

annualized, net of fees

ARC Payment

10.1%

of actuarially required contribution

How Manchester Employees' Contributory Retirement System Funded Ratio Compares

Plan Funded Ratio 96.3%
National avg

A ratio of 96.3% compared against the national public-pension average of 73.5%.

Healthy Threshold

Plans above 80% are generally considered adequately funded by NASRA standards.

Participant Composition

Participants: 1.1K active, 1.1K retired, 0 separated Plan participant breakdown showing active workers, retirees, and separated-vested members. PARTICIPANT MIX 2.3K total members 48% 47% Active 1.1K Retired 1.1K Separated 0 Active-to-Retiree 1.03 · Transitioning
Plan participant breakdown: 1.1K active workers, 1.1K retirees, 0 separated-vested members. Sustainability rating: Transitioning.

The active-to-retiree ratio is a leading indicator of long-term plan sustainability — plans with more retirees than active contributors face mounting cash-flow pressure as benefit payments outpace incoming contributions.

Investment Policy Mix

Asset Allocation: 55% equity, 25% fixed income, 17% alternatives Manchester Employees' Contributory Retirement System investment policy mix as reported in Form 5500 Schedule H disclosures. ASSET ALLOCATION $274M market assets · Form 5500 Schedule H 55% 25% 17% Equity 55.0% Fixed Inc. 25.0% Alternatives 17.0% Cash 3.0% Investment Stance: Growth-Tilted · Equity + Alts 72%
Manchester Employees' Contributory Retirement System asset allocation: 55% equity, 25% fixed income, 17% alternatives, 3% cash. Investment stance: Growth-Tilted.

Public pension plans report their asset allocation in Form 5500 Schedule H Part I disclosures. Equity-heavy mixes capture market upside but introduce volatility; fixed-income tilts protect funded status during downturns at the cost of long-run return.

Historical Funded Ratio

Year Funded Ratio
2024 96.3%
2023 98.6%
2022 101.9%
2021 103.2%
2020 99.2%
2019 98.7%
2018 95.7%
2017 94.4%
2016 91.7%
2015 89.6%
2014 84.2%
2013 79.0%
2012 76.7%
2011 76.6%
2010 76.6%
2009 78.4%
2008 80.8%
2007 79.7%
2006 76.2%
2005 75.7%

What the Data Says About Manchester Employees' Contributory Retirement System

Manchester Employees' Contributory Retirement System reports a funded ratio of 96.3% as of fiscal year 2023, earning a financial health grade of B in the Public Plans Database. The plan holds $274M in market assets against an unfunded liability of $11M. As a General State plan operating under New Hampshire sponsorship, it covers 2,333 members (1,119 active contributors, 1,088 retirees drawing benefits). These figures aggregate from Form 5500 filings submitted to the Department of Labor and actuarial valuations reported through NASRA.

A funded ratio above 80% signals that Manchester Employees' Contributory Retirement System has substantial assets to meet projected obligations, placing it above the national public-pension average of roughly 72–75%. Employer contributions covered 10.1% of the Annual Required Contribution in the most recent reporting cycle, while the plan posted a 5-year average investment return of 8.2%. The relationship between contribution adequacy and investment performance determines whether the unfunded liability narrows or expands year over year.

For New Hampshire taxpayers and plan members, the $11M unfunded gap represents the actuarial shortfall that must eventually be closed through a combination of contributions, investment returns, or benefit modifications. Unlike private-sector pensions governed by ERISA and backstopped by the PBGC, public plans like Manchester Employees' Contributory Retirement System rely on the full faith and credit of New Hampshire — meaning funding shortfalls flow through to state and local budgets rather than a federal insurance program. This information summarizes official Public Plans Database disclosures and is provided for research and educational purposes only. It is not financial, legal, or retirement-planning advice; active and retired members with specific benefit questions should consult their plan administrator directly.

Membership

1,119
Active Members
1,088
Retirees
2,333
Total Members

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Manchester Employees' Contributory Retirement System fully funded?

Manchester Employees' Contributory Retirement System has a funded ratio of 96.3% as of FY2023, earning a health grade of B. A funded ratio of 100% means the plan has enough assets to cover all projected liabilities. Ratios above 80% are generally considered adequately funded; ratios below 60% indicate significant underfunding and risk to future benefits.

What happens if Manchester Employees' Contributory Retirement System runs out of money?

Public pension plans like Manchester Employees' Contributory Retirement System are backed by the sponsoring government entity — in this case New Hampshire. If a plan's assets are insufficient, the state or local government is typically required to make up the difference through increased contributions, benefit adjustments, or tax measures. Unlike private pensions, public pensions are not insured by the PBGC, but they do carry the full faith and credit of the sponsoring government.

What does a funded ratio of 96.3% mean?

A funded ratio of 96.3% means that Manchester Employees' Contributory Retirement System currently has assets equal to 96.3% of its projected benefit obligations. The unfunded liability — the gap between assets and liabilities — stands at $11M. This is considered adequately funded.

How does Manchester Employees' Contributory Retirement System compare to other public pensions?

Manchester Employees' Contributory Retirement System is a General State plan in New Hampshire serving 2,333 members. Nationally, the average funded ratio for public pension plans tracked by the Public Plans Database is approximately 72–75%. Manchester Employees' Contributory Retirement System's funded ratio of 96.3% places it above the national average, reflecting strong fiscal management.

How many members does Manchester Employees' Contributory Retirement System have?

Manchester Employees' Contributory Retirement System covers 2,333 total members, including 1,119 active employees and 1,088 retirees currently receiving benefits. The ratio of active members to retirees is a key indicator of plan sustainability — when the number of retirees grows relative to active contributors, funding pressure increases.

What is the ARC payment percentage for Manchester Employees' Contributory Retirement System?

Manchester Employees' Contributory Retirement System pays 10.1% of its Annual Required Contribution (ARC). Consistently underpaying the ARC accelerates the growth of unfunded liabilities and places future benefits at greater risk. Employer contribution patterns are tracked annually in the Public Plans Database.

Related

Data sourced from official Public Plans Database and actuarial valuations from federal and state pension systems. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by Kiznis Studio Editorial

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the Public Plans Database (PPD). Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.

All federal data sources used on this page