Plan
Jersey City Municipal Employees Pension Fund
State
New Jersey
Funded Ratio
71.3%
Assets
$161M
Members
1,166
Health Grade: C — Underfunded — significant gap between assets and liabilities
FY2023 data Grade C Public Plans Database

Jersey City Municipal Employees Pension Fund

Funded ratio, unfunded liability, member counts, ARC coverage, and 23-year financial history for Jersey City Municipal Employees Pension Fund — sourced from the Public Plans Database (Boston College CRR) and cross-checked against actuarial valuations.

Funded Ratio: 71.3% (At Risk) Jersey City Municipal Employees Pension Fund funded ratio compared to national public pension benchmark. FUNDED RATIO 71.3% At Risk Nat'l avg 73.5% 0% 60 70 80 100% Healthy > 80% · At-risk 70-80% · Critical < 60%
Jersey City Municipal Employees Pension Fund funded ratio is 71.3 percent — classified as At Risk. National public-pension benchmark is 73.5 percent.
C
Financial Health Grade
Underfunded — significant gap between assets and liabilities

Funded Ratio

71.3%

actuarial assets / liabilities

Unfunded Liability

$65M

actuarial shortfall

Total Members

1,166

active + retired + vested

1-Year Return

4.0%

net investment return

-0.8pp vs 5-yr avg

5-Year Avg Return

4.8%

annualized, net of fees

ARC Payment

38.2%

of actuarially required contribution

How Jersey City Municipal Employees Pension Fund Funded Ratio Compares

Plan Funded Ratio 71.3%
National avg

A ratio of 71.3% compared against the national public-pension average of 73.5%.

Healthy Threshold

Plans above 80% are generally considered adequately funded by NASRA standards.

Participant Composition

Participants: 695 active, 442 retired, 0 separated Plan participant breakdown showing active workers, retirees, and separated-vested members. PARTICIPANT MIX 1.2K total members 60% 38% Active 695 Retired 442 Separated 0 Active-to-Retiree 1.57 · Sustainable
Plan participant breakdown: 695 active workers, 442 retirees, 0 separated-vested members. Sustainability rating: Sustainable.

The active-to-retiree ratio is a leading indicator of long-term plan sustainability — plans with more retirees than active contributors face mounting cash-flow pressure as benefit payments outpace incoming contributions.

Investment Policy Mix

Asset Allocation: 55% equity, 25% fixed income, 17% alternatives Jersey City Municipal Employees Pension Fund investment policy mix as reported in Form 5500 Schedule H disclosures. ASSET ALLOCATION $161M market assets · Form 5500 Schedule H 55% 25% 17% Equity 55.0% Fixed Inc. 25.0% Alternatives 17.0% Cash 3.0% Investment Stance: Growth-Tilted · Equity + Alts 72%
Jersey City Municipal Employees Pension Fund asset allocation: 55% equity, 25% fixed income, 17% alternatives, 3% cash. Investment stance: Growth-Tilted.

Public pension plans report their asset allocation in Form 5500 Schedule H Part I disclosures. Equity-heavy mixes capture market upside but introduce volatility; fixed-income tilts protect funded status during downturns at the cost of long-run return.

Historical Funded Ratio

Year Funded Ratio
2024 71.3%
2023 70.7%
2022 72.6%
2021 79.5%
2020 75.0%
2019 74.2%
2018 74.1%
2017 72.4%
2016 77.8%
2015 78.4%
2014 76.2%
2013 72.3%
2012 76.5%
2011 66.0%
2010 69.4%
2009 63.1%
2008 62.9%
2007 63.3%
2006 62.8%
2005 68.3%

What the Data Says About Jersey City Municipal Employees Pension Fund

Jersey City Municipal Employees Pension Fund reports a funded ratio of 71.3% as of fiscal year 2023, earning a financial health grade of C in the Public Plans Database. The plan holds $161M in market assets against an unfunded liability of $65M. As a Municipal plan operating under New Jersey sponsorship, it covers 1,166 members (695 active contributors, 442 retirees drawing benefits). These figures aggregate from Form 5500 filings submitted to the Department of Labor and actuarial valuations reported through NASRA.

A funded ratio in the 60–80% range indicates moderate underfunding that falls near the national average of 72–75% but leaves the plan exposed to market downturns and demographic shifts. Employer contributions covered 38.2% of the Annual Required Contribution in the most recent reporting cycle, while the plan posted a 5-year average investment return of 4.8%. The relationship between contribution adequacy and investment performance determines whether the unfunded liability narrows or expands year over year.

For New Jersey taxpayers and plan members, the $65M unfunded gap represents the actuarial shortfall that must eventually be closed through a combination of contributions, investment returns, or benefit modifications. Unlike private-sector pensions governed by ERISA and backstopped by the PBGC, public plans like Jersey City Municipal Employees Pension Fund rely on the full faith and credit of New Jersey — meaning funding shortfalls flow through to state and local budgets rather than a federal insurance program. This information summarizes official Public Plans Database disclosures and is provided for research and educational purposes only. It is not financial, legal, or retirement-planning advice; active and retired members with specific benefit questions should consult their plan administrator directly.

Membership

695
Active Members
442
Retirees
1,166
Total Members

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Jersey City Municipal Employees Pension Fund fully funded?

Jersey City Municipal Employees Pension Fund has a funded ratio of 71.3% as of FY2023, earning a health grade of C. A funded ratio of 100% means the plan has enough assets to cover all projected liabilities. Ratios above 80% are generally considered adequately funded; ratios below 60% indicate significant underfunding and risk to future benefits.

What happens if Jersey City Municipal Employees Pension Fund runs out of money?

Public pension plans like Jersey City Municipal Employees Pension Fund are backed by the sponsoring government entity — in this case New Jersey. If a plan's assets are insufficient, the state or local government is typically required to make up the difference through increased contributions, benefit adjustments, or tax measures. Unlike private pensions, public pensions are not insured by the PBGC, but they do carry the full faith and credit of the sponsoring government.

What does a funded ratio of 71.3% mean?

A funded ratio of 71.3% means that Jersey City Municipal Employees Pension Fund currently has assets equal to 71.3% of its projected benefit obligations. The unfunded liability — the gap between assets and liabilities — stands at $65M. This represents a moderate funding gap that requires ongoing monitoring.

How does Jersey City Municipal Employees Pension Fund compare to other public pensions?

Jersey City Municipal Employees Pension Fund is a Municipal plan in New Jersey serving 1,166 members. Nationally, the average funded ratio for public pension plans tracked by the Public Plans Database is approximately 72–75%. Jersey City Municipal Employees Pension Fund's funded ratio of 71.3% places it near the national average.

How many members does Jersey City Municipal Employees Pension Fund have?

Jersey City Municipal Employees Pension Fund covers 1,166 total members, including 695 active employees and 442 retirees currently receiving benefits. The ratio of active members to retirees is a key indicator of plan sustainability — when the number of retirees grows relative to active contributors, funding pressure increases.

What is the ARC payment percentage for Jersey City Municipal Employees Pension Fund?

Jersey City Municipal Employees Pension Fund pays 38.2% of its Annual Required Contribution (ARC). Consistently underpaying the ARC accelerates the growth of unfunded liabilities and places future benefits at greater risk. Employer contribution patterns are tracked annually in the Public Plans Database.

Related

Data sourced from official Public Plans Database and actuarial valuations from federal and state pension systems. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by Kiznis Studio Editorial

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the Public Plans Database (PPD). Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.

All federal data sources used on this page