FY2024 source-reconciled actuarial data · Public Plans Database

Miami General and Sanitation Employees

Everything the Public Plans Database tracks for Miami General and Sanitation Employees: funded ratio, unfunded liability, membership, and 23 years of financial history, compiled by Boston College CRR and checked against actuarial valuations.

By · · Florida · General State Plan · Data through FY2024

Funded Ratio: 69.3% (Under-funded) Miami General and Sanitation Employees funded ratio compared to national public pension benchmark. FUNDED RATIO 69.3% Under-funded Nat'l avg 75.49869791666667% 0% 60 70 80 100% Healthy > 80% · At-risk 70-80% · Critical < 60%
Miami General and Sanitation Employees funded ratio is 69.3 percent, classified as Under-funded. National public-pension benchmark is 75.49869791666667 percent.
Actuarial funded ratio
69.3%
Health grade
CReported funded ratio below full funding
Actuarial assets
$979M
Members
4,134

According to the Public Plans Database, compiled by the Boston College Center for Retirement Research, Miami General and Sanitation Employees is one of 197 public pension plans tracked nationwide. The plan card reports source-reconciled actuarial figures through FY2024; the multi-year table includes only years whose reported ratio ties to its actuarial dollars. This site’s database copy was last loaded in July 2026. See our methodology for the full source and update cadence.

Sliding funded-ratio path

Miami General and Sanitation Employees lost 33.8 points from FY2001 (103.1%) to FY2024 (69.3%) on the reconciled series.

Miami General and Sanitation Employees on a sliding funded path

According to the Public Plans Database, Miami General and Sanitation Employees lost 33.8 points on the reconciled series from FY2001 to FY2024, and now reports 69.3% (grade C).

69.3%
Funded · #102 of 192
C
Health grade
$434M
Actuarial unfunded liability
-33.8pp
FY2001→FY2024
Subscribe to funded-ratio changes (RSS)

Actuarial Unfunded Liability

$434M

Below-median unfunded liability · source-reported UAAL

Total Members

4,134

active + retired + vested

1-Year Return

9.6%

Above assumed rate · net investment return

1.3pp vs 5-yr avg

5-Year Avg Return

8.3%

Above assumed rate · annualized, net of fees

F
Composite Health Score
35/100
Miami General and Sanitation Employees

Transparent derived index from public pension-plan filings, not an official rating. A 4-dimension composite (funded ratio, contribution discipline, 5-year investment return, unfunded burden), each scored against this dataset's own percentile distribution across 197 reporting plans. Not the same as the plan's headline funded-ratio grade above. See the exact dimensions, weights, and formula.

Funded Ratio F
69.3%
Actuarial assets as a share of liabilities
Contribution Discipline F
100.0%
Share of the actuarially required contribution actually paid
Investment Returns D
8.3%
5-year annualized investment return
Unfunded Burden F
28.9%
Unfunded liability as a share of total obligations
How this score is calculated (benchmark table)
Dimension P10 P25 P50 P75 P90 Weight
Funded ratio (higher = better) 57.6% 67.2% 75.0% 87.0% 97.6% 0.35
Contribution discipline (ARC) (higher = better) 88.4% 100.0% 100.0% 104.1% 122.1% 0.25
5yr investment return (higher = better) 6.4% 7.5% 8.3% 9.1% 9.9% 0.20
Unfunded burden (lower = better) 2.0% 12.7% 25.0% 33.1% 42.4% 0.20

Percentiles computed across all 197 plans in this database with a reported value for that metric (2026-09-09). A dimension a plan does not report drops out of its composite, and that weight redistributes across the dimensions it does report, so thin reporting never silently lowers a score relative to a fully-reported peer.

Participant Composition

Participants: 1.9K active, 2.0K retired, 0 separated Plan participant breakdown showing active workers, retirees, and separated-vested members. PARTICIPANT MIX 4.1K total members 45% 48% Active 1.9K Retired 2.0K Separated 0 Active-to-Retiree 0.95 · Mature / At Risk
Plan participant breakdown: 1.9K active workers, 2.0K retirees, 0 separated-vested members. Sustainability rating: Mature / At Risk.

Investment Policy Mix

Asset Allocation: 55% equity, 25% fixed income, 17% alternatives Miami General and Sanitation Employees investment policy mix as reported in its CAFR and actuarial valuation. ASSET ALLOCATION $1.1B market assets · CAFR / actuarial valuation 55% 25% 17% Equity 55.0% Fixed Inc. 25.0% Alternatives 17.0% Cash 3.0% Investment Stance: Growth-Tilted · Equity + Alts 72%
Miami General and Sanitation Employees asset allocation: 55% equity, 25% fixed income, 17% alternatives, 3% cash. Investment stance: Growth-Tilted.

Funded ratio, 2001 to 2024

Assets as a share of the benefits already promised, one point per reported year. Down 33.8 points across the series. This is the multi-year table's series, so its last point can be a later year than the plan card above, which reports the plan's own latest valuation.

60%70%80%90%100%110% 200120042007201120142017202020232024 69.3%

What changed, FY2023 to FY2024

3.3 pts funded ratio

Miami General and Sanitation Employees's funded ratio fell 3.3 points from FY2023 to FY2024, with assets contributing +4.8 points and the accrued liability contributing -8.1.

Funded ratio
72.6% → 69.3%
Actuarial assets
$918M → $979M (+6.6%)
Accrued liability
$1.27B → $1.41B (+11.6%)
Where the 3.3-point move came from
Assets
+4.8 pts
Accrued liability
-8.1 pts

Accrued liability is the source-reported value for benefits already promised. The two contributions are the move the ratio would have made on the prior year’s liability (assets) and the remainder (liability); they sum to the total by construction. Both years shown provide source-reconciled actuarial assets and liability, so neither figure rests on a ratio published on its own. Source: Public Plans Database (Boston College CRR / NASRA), loaded July 2026. See our funding-change board for how this plan’s move compares with the rest of the dataset.

Historical Actuarial Funding

Year Actuarial Ratio
2024 69.3%
2023 72.6%
2022 74.1%
2021 74.5%
2020 69.8%
2019 66.1%
2018 65.5%
2017 65.8%
2016 65.0%
2015 67.4%
2014 66.6%
2013 64.3%
2012 65.4%
2011 71.1%
2010 78.0%
2009 83.0%
2007 86.0%
2006 84.0%
2005 79.0%
2004 80.0%

What the Data Says About Miami General and Sanitation Employees

Miami General and Sanitation Employees is funded above the midpoint but still carries a real shortfall, 6 points below the 75.5% national average across tracked plans. A 5-year average investment return of 8.3% factors into the plan's overall trajectory.

For Florida taxpayers and plan members, the $434M source-reported actuarial unfunded liability is the shortfall this plan must close over time.

Where this data comes from + how funding gaps get resolved

These figures come from the Public Plans Database, a collaboration between the Boston College Center for Retirement Research and NASRA that compiles them from each plan's Comprehensive Annual Financial Reports (CAFRs) and actuarial valuations. The relationship between contribution adequacy and investment performance determines whether an unfunded liability narrows or expands year over year, and the gap itself is typically closed through some combination of higher contributions, investment returns, or benefit modifications. See our methodology for how public-pension funding differs from ERISA-backed private plans, and our disclaimer below before acting on this data.

Membership

1,875
Active Members
1,967
Retirees
4,134
Total Members

Plan Details

Plan Type
General State
State
Florida
Market Assets
$1.07B
Source: Public Plans Database (PPD)
Boston College CRR / NASRA

Plans With a Similar Funded Ratio

The closest plans nationwide to Miami General and Sanitation Employees's 73.5% funded ratio.

Showing 5 of 191 plans nationwide with a reported funded ratio.

Every figure on PlainPension is rendered directly from the Public Plans Database (Boston College Center for Retirement Research), no number is typed in by an editor. Miami General and Sanitation Employees ranks #102 of 192 by funded ratio and #160 of 190 by membership. This information is for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice, consult a qualified professional before acting on it. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the typed corrections pathway, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of July 2026.