Plan
Minnesota Teachers Retirement Association
State
Minnesota
Funded Ratio
75.2%
Assets
$26.75B
Members
174,745
Health Grade: C — Underfunded — significant gap between assets and liabilities
FY2023 data Grade C Public Plans Database

Minnesota Teachers Retirement Association

Funded ratio, unfunded liability, member counts, ARC coverage, and 23-year financial history for Minnesota Teachers Retirement Association — sourced from the Public Plans Database (Boston College CRR) and cross-checked against actuarial valuations.

Funded Ratio: 75.2% (At Risk) Minnesota Teachers Retirement Association funded ratio compared to national public pension benchmark. FUNDED RATIO 75.2% At Risk Nat'l avg 73.5% 0% 60 70 80 100% Healthy > 80% · At-risk 70-80% · Critical < 60%
Minnesota Teachers Retirement Association funded ratio is 75.2 percent — classified as At Risk. National public-pension benchmark is 73.5 percent.
C
Financial Health Grade
Underfunded — significant gap between assets and liabilities

Funded Ratio

75.2%

actuarial assets / liabilities

Unfunded Liability

$8.84B

actuarial shortfall

Total Members

174,745

active + retired + vested

1-Year Return

7.7%

net investment return

0.4pp vs 5-yr avg

5-Year Avg Return

7.3%

annualized, net of fees

ARC Payment

19.4%

of actuarially required contribution

How Minnesota Teachers Retirement Association Funded Ratio Compares

Plan Funded Ratio 75.2%
National avg

A ratio of 75.2% compared against the national public-pension average of 73.5%.

Healthy Threshold

Plans above 80% are generally considered adequately funded by NASRA standards.

Participant Composition

Participants: 85.0K active, 70.3K retired, 0 separated Plan participant breakdown showing active workers, retirees, and separated-vested members. PARTICIPANT MIX 174.7K total members 49% 40% Active 85.0K Retired 70.3K Separated 0 Active-to-Retiree 1.21 · Transitioning
Plan participant breakdown: 85.0K active workers, 70.3K retirees, 0 separated-vested members. Sustainability rating: Transitioning.

The active-to-retiree ratio is a leading indicator of long-term plan sustainability — plans with more retirees than active contributors face mounting cash-flow pressure as benefit payments outpace incoming contributions.

Investment Policy Mix

Asset Allocation: 55% equity, 25% fixed income, 17% alternatives Minnesota Teachers Retirement Association investment policy mix as reported in Form 5500 Schedule H disclosures. ASSET ALLOCATION $26.8B market assets · Form 5500 Schedule H 55% 25% 17% Equity 55.0% Fixed Inc. 25.0% Alternatives 17.0% Cash 3.0% Investment Stance: Growth-Tilted · Equity + Alts 72%
Minnesota Teachers Retirement Association asset allocation: 55% equity, 25% fixed income, 17% alternatives, 3% cash. Investment stance: Growth-Tilted.

Public pension plans report their asset allocation in Form 5500 Schedule H Part I disclosures. Equity-heavy mixes capture market upside but introduce volatility; fixed-income tilts protect funded status during downturns at the cost of long-run return.

Historical Funded Ratio

Year Funded Ratio
2024 75.2%
2023 75.2%
2022 72.5%
2021 72.8%
2020 66.0%
2019 65.8%
2018 68.0%
2017 67.7%
2016 66.8%
2015 66.5%
2014 70.6%
2013 71.7%
2012 71.4%
2011 72.6%
2010 74.5%
2009 75.5%
2008 75.1%
2007 77.3%
2006 76.4%
2005 76.0%

What the Data Says About Minnesota Teachers Retirement Association

Minnesota Teachers Retirement Association reports a funded ratio of 75.2% as of fiscal year 2023, earning a financial health grade of C in the Public Plans Database. The plan holds $26.75B in market assets against an unfunded liability of $8.84B. As a Teachers plan operating under Minnesota sponsorship, it covers 174,745 members (84,983 active contributors, 70,344 retirees drawing benefits). These figures aggregate from Form 5500 filings submitted to the Department of Labor and actuarial valuations reported through NASRA.

A funded ratio in the 60–80% range indicates moderate underfunding that falls near the national average of 72–75% but leaves the plan exposed to market downturns and demographic shifts. Employer contributions covered 19.4% of the Annual Required Contribution in the most recent reporting cycle, while the plan posted a 5-year average investment return of 7.3%. The relationship between contribution adequacy and investment performance determines whether the unfunded liability narrows or expands year over year.

For Minnesota taxpayers and plan members, the $8.84B unfunded gap represents the actuarial shortfall that must eventually be closed through a combination of contributions, investment returns, or benefit modifications. Unlike private-sector pensions governed by ERISA and backstopped by the PBGC, public plans like Minnesota Teachers Retirement Association rely on the full faith and credit of Minnesota — meaning funding shortfalls flow through to state and local budgets rather than a federal insurance program. This information summarizes official Public Plans Database disclosures and is provided for research and educational purposes only. It is not financial, legal, or retirement-planning advice; active and retired members with specific benefit questions should consult their plan administrator directly.

Membership

84,983
Active Members
70,344
Retirees
174,745
Total Members

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Minnesota Teachers Retirement Association fully funded?

Minnesota Teachers Retirement Association has a funded ratio of 75.2% as of FY2023, earning a health grade of C. A funded ratio of 100% means the plan has enough assets to cover all projected liabilities. Ratios above 80% are generally considered adequately funded; ratios below 60% indicate significant underfunding and risk to future benefits.

What happens if Minnesota Teachers Retirement Association runs out of money?

Public pension plans like Minnesota Teachers Retirement Association are backed by the sponsoring government entity — in this case Minnesota. If a plan's assets are insufficient, the state or local government is typically required to make up the difference through increased contributions, benefit adjustments, or tax measures. Unlike private pensions, public pensions are not insured by the PBGC, but they do carry the full faith and credit of the sponsoring government.

What does a funded ratio of 75.2% mean?

A funded ratio of 75.2% means that Minnesota Teachers Retirement Association currently has assets equal to 75.2% of its projected benefit obligations. The unfunded liability — the gap between assets and liabilities — stands at $8.84B. This represents a moderate funding gap that requires ongoing monitoring.

How does Minnesota Teachers Retirement Association compare to other public pensions?

Minnesota Teachers Retirement Association is a Teachers plan in Minnesota serving 174,745 members. Nationally, the average funded ratio for public pension plans tracked by the Public Plans Database is approximately 72–75%. Minnesota Teachers Retirement Association's funded ratio of 75.2% places it near the national average.

How many members does Minnesota Teachers Retirement Association have?

Minnesota Teachers Retirement Association covers 174,745 total members, including 84,983 active employees and 70,344 retirees currently receiving benefits. The ratio of active members to retirees is a key indicator of plan sustainability — when the number of retirees grows relative to active contributors, funding pressure increases.

What is the ARC payment percentage for Minnesota Teachers Retirement Association?

Minnesota Teachers Retirement Association pays 19.4% of its Annual Required Contribution (ARC). Consistently underpaying the ARC accelerates the growth of unfunded liabilities and places future benefits at greater risk. Employer contribution patterns are tracked annually in the Public Plans Database.

Related

Data sourced from official Public Plans Database and actuarial valuations from federal and state pension systems. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by Kiznis Studio Editorial

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the Public Plans Database (PPD). Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.

All federal data sources used on this page