FY2024 source-reconciled actuarial data · Public Plans Database

Montana Teachers Retirement System

The Public Plans Database's 23-year record for Montana Teachers Retirement System: funded ratio, unfunded liability, member counts, and investment returns, compiled by Boston College CRR and cross-checked against actuarial valuations.

By · · Montana · Teachers Plan · Data through FY2024

Funded Ratio: 74.3% (At Risk) Montana Teachers Retirement System funded ratio compared to national public pension benchmark. FUNDED RATIO 74.3% At Risk Nat'l avg 75.49869791666667% 0% 60 70 80 100% Healthy > 80% · At-risk 70-80% · Critical < 60%
Montana Teachers Retirement System funded ratio is 74.3 percent, classified as At Risk. National public-pension benchmark is 75.49869791666667 percent.
Actuarial funded ratio
74.3%
Health grade
CReported funded ratio below full funding
Actuarial assets
$5.22B
Members
39,454

According to the Public Plans Database, compiled by the Boston College Center for Retirement Research, Montana Teachers Retirement System is one of 197 public pension plans tracked nationwide. The plan card reports source-reconciled actuarial figures through FY2024; the multi-year table includes only years whose reported ratio ties to its actuarial dollars. This site’s database copy was last loaded in July 2026. See our methodology for the full source and update cadence.

Recovering funded-ratio path

Montana Teachers Retirement System gained 8.8 points from FY2010 (65.4%) to FY2024 (74.3%) on the reconciled series.

Montana Teachers Retirement System on a recovering funded path

According to the Public Plans Database, Montana Teachers Retirement System gained 8.8 points on the reconciled series from FY2010 to FY2024, and now reports 74.3% (grade C).

74.3%
Funded · #132 of 192
C
Health grade
$1.81B
Actuarial unfunded liability
+8.8pp
FY2010→FY2024
Subscribe to funded-ratio changes (RSS)

Actuarial Unfunded Liability

$1.81B

Above-median unfunded liability · source-reported UAAL

Total Members

39,454

active + retired + vested

1-Year Return

8.9%

Above assumed rate · net investment return

-2.4pp vs 5-yr avg

5-Year Avg Return

11.3%

Strong return year · annualized, net of fees

C-
Composite Health Score
52/100
Montana Teachers Retirement System

Transparent derived index from public pension-plan filings, not an official rating. A 4-dimension composite (funded ratio, contribution discipline, 5-year investment return, unfunded burden), each scored against this dataset's own percentile distribution across 197 reporting plans. Not the same as the plan's headline funded-ratio grade above. See the exact dimensions, weights, and formula.

Funded Ratio D
74.3%
Actuarial assets as a share of liabilities
Contribution Discipline F
100.0%
Share of the actuarially required contribution actually paid
Investment Returns A+
11.3%
5-year annualized investment return
Unfunded Burden D
26.0%
Unfunded liability as a share of total obligations
How this score is calculated (benchmark table)
Dimension P10 P25 P50 P75 P90 Weight
Funded ratio (higher = better) 57.6% 67.2% 75.0% 87.0% 97.6% 0.35
Contribution discipline (ARC) (higher = better) 88.4% 100.0% 100.0% 104.1% 122.1% 0.25
5yr investment return (higher = better) 6.4% 7.5% 8.3% 9.1% 9.9% 0.20
Unfunded burden (lower = better) 2.0% 12.7% 25.0% 33.1% 42.4% 0.20

Percentiles computed across all 197 plans in this database with a reported value for that metric (2026-09-09). A dimension a plan does not report drops out of its composite, and that weight redistributes across the dimensions it does report, so thin reporting never silently lowers a score relative to a fully-reported peer.

Participant Composition

Participants: 19.5K active, 17.7K retired, 0 separated Plan participant breakdown showing active workers, retirees, and separated-vested members. PARTICIPANT MIX 39.5K total members 50% 45% Active 19.5K Retired 17.7K Separated 0 Active-to-Retiree 1.10 · Transitioning
Plan participant breakdown: 19.5K active workers, 17.7K retirees, 0 separated-vested members. Sustainability rating: Transitioning.

Investment Policy Mix

Asset Allocation: 55% equity, 25% fixed income, 17% alternatives Montana Teachers Retirement System investment policy mix as reported in its CAFR and actuarial valuation. ASSET ALLOCATION $5.2B market assets · CAFR / actuarial valuation 55% 25% 17% Equity 55.0% Fixed Inc. 25.0% Alternatives 17.0% Cash 3.0% Investment Stance: Growth-Tilted · Equity + Alts 72%
Montana Teachers Retirement System asset allocation: 55% equity, 25% fixed income, 17% alternatives, 3% cash. Investment stance: Growth-Tilted.

Funded ratio, 2010 to 2024

Assets as a share of the benefits already promised, one point per reported year. Up 8.8 points across the series. This is the multi-year table's series, so its last point can be a later year than the plan card above, which reports the plan's own latest valuation.

55%60%65%70%75%80% 20102012201420162018202020222024 74.3%

What changed, FY2023 to FY2024

1.8 pts funded ratio

Montana Teachers Retirement System's funded ratio rose 1.8 points from FY2023 to FY2024, with assets contributing +3.6 points and the accrued liability contributing -1.8.

Funded ratio
72.5% → 74.3%
Actuarial assets
$4.97B → $5.22B (+4.9%)
Accrued liability
$6.86B → $7.03B (+2.4%)
Where the 1.8-point move came from
Assets
+3.6 pts
Accrued liability
-1.8 pts

Accrued liability is the source-reported value for benefits already promised. The two contributions are the move the ratio would have made on the prior year’s liability (assets) and the remainder (liability); they sum to the total by construction. Both years shown provide source-reconciled actuarial assets and liability, so neither figure rests on a ratio published on its own. Source: Public Plans Database (Boston College CRR / NASRA), loaded July 2026. See our funding-change board for how this plan’s move compares with the rest of the dataset.

Historical Actuarial Funding

Year Actuarial Ratio
2024 74.3%
2023 72.5%
2022 71.7%
2021 71.4%
2020 68.8%
2019 68.6%
2018 68.2%
2017 70.5%
2016 69.3%
2015 67.5%
2014 65.4%
2013 66.8%
2012 59.2%
2011 61.5%
2010 65.4%

What the Data Says About Montana Teachers Retirement System

Montana Teachers Retirement System shows a comfortably above-average funding position, 1 points below the 75.5% national average across tracked plans. A 5-year average investment return of 11.3% factors into the plan's overall trajectory.

For Montana taxpayers and plan members, the $1.81B source-reported actuarial unfunded liability is the shortfall this plan must close over time.

Where this data comes from + how funding gaps get resolved

These figures come from the Public Plans Database, a collaboration between the Boston College Center for Retirement Research and NASRA that compiles them from each plan's Comprehensive Annual Financial Reports (CAFRs) and actuarial valuations. The relationship between contribution adequacy and investment performance determines whether an unfunded liability narrows or expands year over year, and the gap itself is typically closed through some combination of higher contributions, investment returns, or benefit modifications. See our methodology for how public-pension funding differs from ERISA-backed private plans, and our disclaimer below before acting on this data.

Membership

19,533
Active Members
17,707
Retirees
39,454
Total Members

Plan Details

Plan Type
Teachers
State
Montana
Market Assets
$5.15B
Source: Public Plans Database (PPD)
Boston College CRR / NASRA

Plans With a Similar Funded Ratio

The closest plans nationwide to Montana Teachers Retirement System's 69.0% funded ratio.

Showing 5 of 191 plans nationwide with a reported funded ratio.

Every figure on PlainPension is rendered directly from the Public Plans Database (Boston College Center for Retirement Research), no number is typed in by an editor. Montana Teachers Retirement System ranks #132 of 192 by funded ratio and #92 of 190 by membership. This information is for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice, consult a qualified professional before acting on it. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the typed corrections pathway, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of July 2026.