Plan
New Mexico Public Employees Retirement Association
State
New Mexico
Funded Ratio
75.7%
Assets
$16.83B
Members
128,106
Health Grade: C — Underfunded — significant gap between assets and liabilities
FY2023 data Grade C Public Plans Database

New Mexico Public Employees Retirement Association

Funded ratio, unfunded liability, member counts, ARC coverage, and 23-year financial history for New Mexico Public Employees Retirement Association — sourced from the Public Plans Database (Boston College CRR) and cross-checked against actuarial valuations.

Funded Ratio: 75.7% (At Risk) New Mexico Public Employees Retirement Association funded ratio compared to national public pension benchmark. FUNDED RATIO 75.7% At Risk Nat'l avg 73.5% 0% 60 70 80 100% Healthy > 80% · At-risk 70-80% · Critical < 60%
New Mexico Public Employees Retirement Association funded ratio is 75.7 percent — classified as At Risk. National public-pension benchmark is 73.5 percent.
C
Financial Health Grade
Underfunded — significant gap between assets and liabilities

Funded Ratio

75.7%

actuarial assets / liabilities

Unfunded Liability

$5.40B

actuarial shortfall

Total Members

128,106

active + retired + vested

1-Year Return

9.1%

net investment return

0.3pp vs 5-yr avg

5-Year Avg Return

8.7%

annualized, net of fees

ARC Payment

11.5%

of actuarially required contribution

How New Mexico Public Employees Retirement Association Funded Ratio Compares

Plan Funded Ratio 75.7%
National avg

A ratio of 75.7% compared against the national public-pension average of 73.5%.

Healthy Threshold

Plans above 80% are generally considered adequately funded by NASRA standards.

Participant Composition

Participants: 54.8K active, 46.1K retired, 0 separated Plan participant breakdown showing active workers, retirees, and separated-vested members. PARTICIPANT MIX 128.1K total members 43% 36% Active 54.8K Retired 46.1K Separated 0 Active-to-Retiree 1.19 · Transitioning
Plan participant breakdown: 54.8K active workers, 46.1K retirees, 0 separated-vested members. Sustainability rating: Transitioning.

The active-to-retiree ratio is a leading indicator of long-term plan sustainability — plans with more retirees than active contributors face mounting cash-flow pressure as benefit payments outpace incoming contributions.

Investment Policy Mix

Asset Allocation: 55% equity, 25% fixed income, 17% alternatives New Mexico Public Employees Retirement Association investment policy mix as reported in Form 5500 Schedule H disclosures. ASSET ALLOCATION $16.8B market assets · Form 5500 Schedule H 55% 25% 17% Equity 55.0% Fixed Inc. 25.0% Alternatives 17.0% Cash 3.0% Investment Stance: Growth-Tilted · Equity + Alts 72%
New Mexico Public Employees Retirement Association asset allocation: 55% equity, 25% fixed income, 17% alternatives, 3% cash. Investment stance: Growth-Tilted.

Public pension plans report their asset allocation in Form 5500 Schedule H Part I disclosures. Equity-heavy mixes capture market upside but introduce volatility; fixed-income tilts protect funded status during downturns at the cost of long-run return.

Historical Funded Ratio

Year Funded Ratio
2024 75.7%
2023 74.8%
2022 75.0%
2021 76.3%
2020 74.1%
2019 74.2%
2018 73.8%
2017 72.8%
2016 77.3%
2015 76.1%
2014 74.4%
2013 80.0%
2012 67.0%
2011 70.0%
2010 74.0%
2009 84.0%
2008 90.0%
2007 91.0%
2006 88.3%
2005 85.5%

What the Data Says About New Mexico Public Employees Retirement Association

New Mexico Public Employees Retirement Association reports a funded ratio of 75.7% as of fiscal year 2023, earning a financial health grade of C in the Public Plans Database. The plan holds $16.83B in market assets against an unfunded liability of $5.40B. As a General State plan operating under New Mexico sponsorship, it covers 128,106 members (54,805 active contributors, 46,072 retirees drawing benefits). These figures aggregate from Form 5500 filings submitted to the Department of Labor and actuarial valuations reported through NASRA.

A funded ratio in the 60–80% range indicates moderate underfunding that falls near the national average of 72–75% but leaves the plan exposed to market downturns and demographic shifts. Employer contributions covered 11.5% of the Annual Required Contribution in the most recent reporting cycle, while the plan posted a 5-year average investment return of 8.7%. The relationship between contribution adequacy and investment performance determines whether the unfunded liability narrows or expands year over year.

For New Mexico taxpayers and plan members, the $5.40B unfunded gap represents the actuarial shortfall that must eventually be closed through a combination of contributions, investment returns, or benefit modifications. Unlike private-sector pensions governed by ERISA and backstopped by the PBGC, public plans like New Mexico Public Employees Retirement Association rely on the full faith and credit of New Mexico — meaning funding shortfalls flow through to state and local budgets rather than a federal insurance program. This information summarizes official Public Plans Database disclosures and is provided for research and educational purposes only. It is not financial, legal, or retirement-planning advice; active and retired members with specific benefit questions should consult their plan administrator directly.

Membership

54,805
Active Members
46,072
Retirees
128,106
Total Members

Frequently Asked Questions

Is New Mexico Public Employees Retirement Association fully funded?

New Mexico Public Employees Retirement Association has a funded ratio of 75.7% as of FY2023, earning a health grade of C. A funded ratio of 100% means the plan has enough assets to cover all projected liabilities. Ratios above 80% are generally considered adequately funded; ratios below 60% indicate significant underfunding and risk to future benefits.

What happens if New Mexico Public Employees Retirement Association runs out of money?

Public pension plans like New Mexico Public Employees Retirement Association are backed by the sponsoring government entity — in this case New Mexico. If a plan's assets are insufficient, the state or local government is typically required to make up the difference through increased contributions, benefit adjustments, or tax measures. Unlike private pensions, public pensions are not insured by the PBGC, but they do carry the full faith and credit of the sponsoring government.

What does a funded ratio of 75.7% mean?

A funded ratio of 75.7% means that New Mexico Public Employees Retirement Association currently has assets equal to 75.7% of its projected benefit obligations. The unfunded liability — the gap between assets and liabilities — stands at $5.40B. This represents a moderate funding gap that requires ongoing monitoring.

How does New Mexico Public Employees Retirement Association compare to other public pensions?

New Mexico Public Employees Retirement Association is a General State plan in New Mexico serving 128,106 members. Nationally, the average funded ratio for public pension plans tracked by the Public Plans Database is approximately 72–75%. New Mexico Public Employees Retirement Association's funded ratio of 75.7% places it near the national average.

How many members does New Mexico Public Employees Retirement Association have?

New Mexico Public Employees Retirement Association covers 128,106 total members, including 54,805 active employees and 46,072 retirees currently receiving benefits. The ratio of active members to retirees is a key indicator of plan sustainability — when the number of retirees grows relative to active contributors, funding pressure increases.

What is the ARC payment percentage for New Mexico Public Employees Retirement Association?

New Mexico Public Employees Retirement Association pays 11.5% of its Annual Required Contribution (ARC). Consistently underpaying the ARC accelerates the growth of unfunded liabilities and places future benefits at greater risk. Employer contribution patterns are tracked annually in the Public Plans Database.

Related

Data sourced from official Public Plans Database and actuarial valuations from federal and state pension systems. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by Kiznis Studio Editorial

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the Public Plans Database (PPD). Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.

All federal data sources used on this page