Plan
New Mexico Educational Retirement Board
State
New Mexico
Funded Ratio
74.3%
Assets
$16.26B
Members
129,946
Health Grade: C — Underfunded — significant gap between assets and liabilities
FY2023 data Grade C Public Plans Database

New Mexico Educational Retirement Board

Funded ratio, unfunded liability, member counts, ARC coverage, and 23-year financial history for New Mexico Educational Retirement Board — sourced from the Public Plans Database (Boston College CRR) and cross-checked against actuarial valuations.

Funded Ratio: 74.3% (At Risk) New Mexico Educational Retirement Board funded ratio compared to national public pension benchmark. FUNDED RATIO 74.3% At Risk Nat'l avg 73.5% 0% 60 70 80 100% Healthy > 80% · At-risk 70-80% · Critical < 60%
New Mexico Educational Retirement Board funded ratio is 74.3 percent — classified as At Risk. National public-pension benchmark is 73.5 percent.
C
Financial Health Grade
Underfunded — significant gap between assets and liabilities

Funded Ratio

74.3%

actuarial assets / liabilities

Unfunded Liability

$5.64B

actuarial shortfall

Total Members

129,946

active + retired + vested

1-Year Return

9.1%

net investment return

0.3pp vs 5-yr avg

5-Year Avg Return

8.7%

annualized, net of fees

ARC Payment

16.6%

of actuarially required contribution

How New Mexico Educational Retirement Board Funded Ratio Compares

Plan Funded Ratio 74.3%
National avg

A ratio of 74.3% compared against the national public-pension average of 73.5%.

Healthy Threshold

Plans above 80% are generally considered adequately funded by NASRA standards.

Participant Composition

Participants: 61.5K active, 54.8K retired, 0 separated Plan participant breakdown showing active workers, retirees, and separated-vested members. PARTICIPANT MIX 129.9K total members 47% 42% Active 61.5K Retired 54.8K Separated 0 Active-to-Retiree 1.12 · Transitioning
Plan participant breakdown: 61.5K active workers, 54.8K retirees, 0 separated-vested members. Sustainability rating: Transitioning.

The active-to-retiree ratio is a leading indicator of long-term plan sustainability — plans with more retirees than active contributors face mounting cash-flow pressure as benefit payments outpace incoming contributions.

Investment Policy Mix

Asset Allocation: 55% equity, 25% fixed income, 17% alternatives New Mexico Educational Retirement Board investment policy mix as reported in Form 5500 Schedule H disclosures. ASSET ALLOCATION $16.3B market assets · Form 5500 Schedule H 55% 25% 17% Equity 55.0% Fixed Inc. 25.0% Alternatives 17.0% Cash 3.0% Investment Stance: Growth-Tilted · Equity + Alts 72%
New Mexico Educational Retirement Board asset allocation: 55% equity, 25% fixed income, 17% alternatives, 3% cash. Investment stance: Growth-Tilted.

Public pension plans report their asset allocation in Form 5500 Schedule H Part I disclosures. Equity-heavy mixes capture market upside but introduce volatility; fixed-income tilts protect funded status during downturns at the cost of long-run return.

Historical Funded Ratio

Year Funded Ratio
2024 74.3%
2023 72.5%
2022 71.7%
2021 71.4%
2020 68.8%
2019 68.6%
2018 68.2%
2017 70.5%
2016 69.3%
2015 67.5%
2014 65.4%
2013 66.8%
2012 59.2%
2011 61.5%
2010 65.4%
2009 66.2%
2008 79.9%
2007 79.6%
2006 76.1%
2005 73.4%

What the Data Says About New Mexico Educational Retirement Board

New Mexico Educational Retirement Board reports a funded ratio of 74.3% as of fiscal year 2023, earning a financial health grade of C in the Public Plans Database. The plan holds $16.26B in market assets against an unfunded liability of $5.64B. As a Teachers plan operating under New Mexico sponsorship, it covers 129,946 members (61,503 active contributors, 54,774 retirees drawing benefits). These figures aggregate from Form 5500 filings submitted to the Department of Labor and actuarial valuations reported through NASRA.

A funded ratio in the 60–80% range indicates moderate underfunding that falls near the national average of 72–75% but leaves the plan exposed to market downturns and demographic shifts. Employer contributions covered 16.6% of the Annual Required Contribution in the most recent reporting cycle, while the plan posted a 5-year average investment return of 8.7%. The relationship between contribution adequacy and investment performance determines whether the unfunded liability narrows or expands year over year.

For New Mexico taxpayers and plan members, the $5.64B unfunded gap represents the actuarial shortfall that must eventually be closed through a combination of contributions, investment returns, or benefit modifications. Unlike private-sector pensions governed by ERISA and backstopped by the PBGC, public plans like New Mexico Educational Retirement Board rely on the full faith and credit of New Mexico — meaning funding shortfalls flow through to state and local budgets rather than a federal insurance program. This information summarizes official Public Plans Database disclosures and is provided for research and educational purposes only. It is not financial, legal, or retirement-planning advice; active and retired members with specific benefit questions should consult their plan administrator directly.

Membership

61,503
Active Members
54,774
Retirees
129,946
Total Members

Frequently Asked Questions

Is New Mexico Educational Retirement Board fully funded?

New Mexico Educational Retirement Board has a funded ratio of 74.3% as of FY2023, earning a health grade of C. A funded ratio of 100% means the plan has enough assets to cover all projected liabilities. Ratios above 80% are generally considered adequately funded; ratios below 60% indicate significant underfunding and risk to future benefits.

What happens if New Mexico Educational Retirement Board runs out of money?

Public pension plans like New Mexico Educational Retirement Board are backed by the sponsoring government entity — in this case New Mexico. If a plan's assets are insufficient, the state or local government is typically required to make up the difference through increased contributions, benefit adjustments, or tax measures. Unlike private pensions, public pensions are not insured by the PBGC, but they do carry the full faith and credit of the sponsoring government.

What does a funded ratio of 74.3% mean?

A funded ratio of 74.3% means that New Mexico Educational Retirement Board currently has assets equal to 74.3% of its projected benefit obligations. The unfunded liability — the gap between assets and liabilities — stands at $5.64B. This represents a moderate funding gap that requires ongoing monitoring.

How does New Mexico Educational Retirement Board compare to other public pensions?

New Mexico Educational Retirement Board is a Teachers plan in New Mexico serving 129,946 members. Nationally, the average funded ratio for public pension plans tracked by the Public Plans Database is approximately 72–75%. New Mexico Educational Retirement Board's funded ratio of 74.3% places it near the national average.

How many members does New Mexico Educational Retirement Board have?

New Mexico Educational Retirement Board covers 129,946 total members, including 61,503 active employees and 54,774 retirees currently receiving benefits. The ratio of active members to retirees is a key indicator of plan sustainability — when the number of retirees grows relative to active contributors, funding pressure increases.

What is the ARC payment percentage for New Mexico Educational Retirement Board?

New Mexico Educational Retirement Board pays 16.6% of its Annual Required Contribution (ARC). Consistently underpaying the ARC accelerates the growth of unfunded liabilities and places future benefits at greater risk. Employer contribution patterns are tracked annually in the Public Plans Database.

Related

Data sourced from official Public Plans Database and actuarial valuations from federal and state pension systems. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by Kiznis Studio Editorial

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the Public Plans Database (PPD). Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.

All federal data sources used on this page