Plan
Omaha Police and Fire Pension FundNew
State
Nebraska
Funded Ratio
72.4%
Assets
$985M
Members
3,158
Health Grade: C — Underfunded — significant gap between assets and liabilities
FY2023 data Grade C Public Plans Database

Omaha Police and Fire Pension FundNew

Funded ratio, unfunded liability, member counts, ARC coverage, and 23-year financial history for Omaha Police and Fire Pension FundNew — sourced from the Public Plans Database (Boston College CRR) and cross-checked against actuarial valuations.

Funded Ratio: 72.4% (At Risk) Omaha Police and Fire Pension FundNew funded ratio compared to national public pension benchmark. FUNDED RATIO 72.4% At Risk Nat'l avg 73.5% 0% 60 70 80 100% Healthy > 80% · At-risk 70-80% · Critical < 60%
Omaha Police and Fire Pension FundNew funded ratio is 72.4 percent — classified as At Risk. National public-pension benchmark is 73.5 percent.
C
Financial Health Grade
Underfunded — significant gap between assets and liabilities

Funded Ratio

72.4%

actuarial assets / liabilities

Unfunded Liability

$376M

actuarial shortfall

Total Members

3,158

active + retired + vested

1-Year Return

10.0%

net investment return

2.1pp vs 5-yr avg

5-Year Avg Return

8.0%

annualized, net of fees

ARC Payment

99.0%

of actuarially required contribution

How Omaha Police and Fire Pension FundNew Funded Ratio Compares

Plan Funded Ratio 72.4%
National avg

A ratio of 72.4% compared against the national public-pension average of 73.5%.

Healthy Threshold

Plans above 80% are generally considered adequately funded by NASRA standards.

Participant Composition

Participants: 1.4K active, 1.8K retired, 0 separated Plan participant breakdown showing active workers, retirees, and separated-vested members. PARTICIPANT MIX 3.2K total members 43% 56% Active 1.4K Retired 1.8K Separated 0 Active-to-Retiree 0.77 · Mature / At Risk
Plan participant breakdown: 1.4K active workers, 1.8K retirees, 0 separated-vested members. Sustainability rating: Mature / At Risk.

The active-to-retiree ratio is a leading indicator of long-term plan sustainability — plans with more retirees than active contributors face mounting cash-flow pressure as benefit payments outpace incoming contributions.

Investment Policy Mix

Asset Allocation: 55% equity, 25% fixed income, 17% alternatives Omaha Police and Fire Pension FundNew investment policy mix as reported in Form 5500 Schedule H disclosures. ASSET ALLOCATION $985M market assets · Form 5500 Schedule H 55% 25% 17% Equity 55.0% Fixed Inc. 25.0% Alternatives 17.0% Cash 3.0% Investment Stance: Growth-Tilted · Equity + Alts 72%
Omaha Police and Fire Pension FundNew asset allocation: 55% equity, 25% fixed income, 17% alternatives, 3% cash. Investment stance: Growth-Tilted.

Public pension plans report their asset allocation in Form 5500 Schedule H Part I disclosures. Equity-heavy mixes capture market upside but introduce volatility; fixed-income tilts protect funded status during downturns at the cost of long-run return.

Historical Funded Ratio

Year Funded Ratio
2024 N/A
2023 72.4%
2022 71.6%
2021 69.5%
2020 64.2%
2019 62.8%
2018 59.1%
2017 56.4%
2016 55.1%
2015 56.2%
2014 55.4%
2013 54.3%
2012 52.3%
2011 50.3%
2010 48.2%
2009 56.8%
2008 56.4%
2007 55.1%
2006 55.8%
2005 60.3%

What the Data Says About Omaha Police and Fire Pension FundNew

Omaha Police and Fire Pension FundNew reports a funded ratio of 72.4% as of fiscal year 2023, earning a financial health grade of C in the Public Plans Database. The plan holds $985M in market assets against an unfunded liability of $376M. As a Police & Fire plan operating under Nebraska sponsorship, it covers 3,158 members (1,371 active contributors, 1,776 retirees drawing benefits). These figures aggregate from Form 5500 filings submitted to the Department of Labor and actuarial valuations reported through NASRA.

A funded ratio in the 60–80% range indicates moderate underfunding that falls near the national average of 72–75% but leaves the plan exposed to market downturns and demographic shifts. Employer contributions covered 99.0% of the Annual Required Contribution in the most recent reporting cycle, while the plan posted a 5-year average investment return of 8.0%. The relationship between contribution adequacy and investment performance determines whether the unfunded liability narrows or expands year over year.

For Nebraska taxpayers and plan members, the $376M unfunded gap represents the actuarial shortfall that must eventually be closed through a combination of contributions, investment returns, or benefit modifications. Unlike private-sector pensions governed by ERISA and backstopped by the PBGC, public plans like Omaha Police and Fire Pension FundNew rely on the full faith and credit of Nebraska — meaning funding shortfalls flow through to state and local budgets rather than a federal insurance program. This information summarizes official Public Plans Database disclosures and is provided for research and educational purposes only. It is not financial, legal, or retirement-planning advice; active and retired members with specific benefit questions should consult their plan administrator directly.

Membership

1,371
Active Members
1,776
Retirees
3,158
Total Members

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Omaha Police and Fire Pension FundNew fully funded?

Omaha Police and Fire Pension FundNew has a funded ratio of 72.4% as of FY2023, earning a health grade of C. A funded ratio of 100% means the plan has enough assets to cover all projected liabilities. Ratios above 80% are generally considered adequately funded; ratios below 60% indicate significant underfunding and risk to future benefits.

What happens if Omaha Police and Fire Pension FundNew runs out of money?

Public pension plans like Omaha Police and Fire Pension FundNew are backed by the sponsoring government entity — in this case Nebraska. If a plan's assets are insufficient, the state or local government is typically required to make up the difference through increased contributions, benefit adjustments, or tax measures. Unlike private pensions, public pensions are not insured by the PBGC, but they do carry the full faith and credit of the sponsoring government.

What does a funded ratio of 72.4% mean?

A funded ratio of 72.4% means that Omaha Police and Fire Pension FundNew currently has assets equal to 72.4% of its projected benefit obligations. The unfunded liability — the gap between assets and liabilities — stands at $376M. This represents a moderate funding gap that requires ongoing monitoring.

How does Omaha Police and Fire Pension FundNew compare to other public pensions?

Omaha Police and Fire Pension FundNew is a Police & Fire plan in Nebraska serving 3,158 members. Nationally, the average funded ratio for public pension plans tracked by the Public Plans Database is approximately 72–75%. Omaha Police and Fire Pension FundNew's funded ratio of 72.4% places it near the national average.

How many members does Omaha Police and Fire Pension FundNew have?

Omaha Police and Fire Pension FundNew covers 3,158 total members, including 1,371 active employees and 1,776 retirees currently receiving benefits. The ratio of active members to retirees is a key indicator of plan sustainability — when the number of retirees grows relative to active contributors, funding pressure increases.

What is the ARC payment percentage for Omaha Police and Fire Pension FundNew?

Omaha Police and Fire Pension FundNew pays 99.0% of its Annual Required Contribution (ARC). While below the full 100% target, this contribution level helps slow the growth of unfunded liabilities. Employer contribution patterns are tracked annually in the Public Plans Database.

Related

Data sourced from official Public Plans Database and actuarial valuations from federal and state pension systems. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by Kiznis Studio Editorial

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the Public Plans Database (PPD). Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.

All federal data sources used on this page