Plan
Phoenix Employees' Retirement System
State
Arizona
Funded Ratio
71.6%
Assets
$3.38B
Members
17,542
Health Grade: C — Underfunded — significant gap between assets and liabilities
FY2023 data Grade C Public Plans Database

Phoenix Employees' Retirement System

Funded ratio, unfunded liability, member counts, ARC coverage, and 23-year financial history for Phoenix Employees' Retirement System — sourced from the Public Plans Database (Boston College CRR) and cross-checked against actuarial valuations.

Funded Ratio: 71.6% (At Risk) Phoenix Employees' Retirement System funded ratio compared to national public pension benchmark. FUNDED RATIO 71.6% At Risk Nat'l avg 73.5% 0% 60 70 80 100% Healthy > 80% · At-risk 70-80% · Critical < 60%
Phoenix Employees' Retirement System funded ratio is 71.6 percent — classified as At Risk. National public-pension benchmark is 73.5 percent.
C
Financial Health Grade
Underfunded — significant gap between assets and liabilities

Funded Ratio

71.6%

actuarial assets / liabilities

Unfunded Liability

$1.34B

actuarial shortfall

Total Members

17,542

active + retired + vested

1-Year Return

8.1%

net investment return

0.3pp vs 5-yr avg

5-Year Avg Return

7.9%

annualized, net of fees

ARC Payment

12.7%

of actuarially required contribution

How Phoenix Employees' Retirement System Funded Ratio Compares

Plan Funded Ratio 71.6%
National avg

A ratio of 71.6% compared against the national public-pension average of 73.5%.

Healthy Threshold

Plans above 80% are generally considered adequately funded by NASRA standards.

Participant Composition

Participants: 8.4K active, 8.0K retired, 0 separated Plan participant breakdown showing active workers, retirees, and separated-vested members. PARTICIPANT MIX 17.5K total members 48% 46% Active 8.4K Retired 8.0K Separated 0 Active-to-Retiree 1.05 · Transitioning
Plan participant breakdown: 8.4K active workers, 8.0K retirees, 0 separated-vested members. Sustainability rating: Transitioning.

The active-to-retiree ratio is a leading indicator of long-term plan sustainability — plans with more retirees than active contributors face mounting cash-flow pressure as benefit payments outpace incoming contributions.

Investment Policy Mix

Asset Allocation: 55% equity, 25% fixed income, 17% alternatives Phoenix Employees' Retirement System investment policy mix as reported in Form 5500 Schedule H disclosures. ASSET ALLOCATION $3.4B market assets · Form 5500 Schedule H 55% 25% 17% Equity 55.0% Fixed Inc. 25.0% Alternatives 17.0% Cash 3.0% Investment Stance: Growth-Tilted · Equity + Alts 72%
Phoenix Employees' Retirement System asset allocation: 55% equity, 25% fixed income, 17% alternatives, 3% cash. Investment stance: Growth-Tilted.

Public pension plans report their asset allocation in Form 5500 Schedule H Part I disclosures. Equity-heavy mixes capture market upside but introduce volatility; fixed-income tilts protect funded status during downturns at the cost of long-run return.

Historical Funded Ratio

Year Funded Ratio
2024 71.6%
2023 71.2%
2022 69.9%
2021 68.6%
2020 65.7%
2019 66.0%
2018 65.4%
2017 63.7%
2016 62.1%
2015 61.6%
2014 61.8%
2013 58.8%
2012 60.9%
2011 66.3%
2010 69.8%
2009 77.7%
2008 81.9%
2007 79.2%
2006 75.4%
2005 74.8%

What the Data Says About Phoenix Employees' Retirement System

Phoenix Employees' Retirement System reports a funded ratio of 71.6% as of fiscal year 2023, earning a financial health grade of C in the Public Plans Database. The plan holds $3.38B in market assets against an unfunded liability of $1.34B. As a General State plan operating under Arizona sponsorship, it covers 17,542 members (8,407 active contributors, 7,986 retirees drawing benefits). These figures aggregate from Form 5500 filings submitted to the Department of Labor and actuarial valuations reported through NASRA.

A funded ratio in the 60–80% range indicates moderate underfunding that falls near the national average of 72–75% but leaves the plan exposed to market downturns and demographic shifts. Employer contributions covered 12.7% of the Annual Required Contribution in the most recent reporting cycle, while the plan posted a 5-year average investment return of 7.9%. The relationship between contribution adequacy and investment performance determines whether the unfunded liability narrows or expands year over year.

For Arizona taxpayers and plan members, the $1.34B unfunded gap represents the actuarial shortfall that must eventually be closed through a combination of contributions, investment returns, or benefit modifications. Unlike private-sector pensions governed by ERISA and backstopped by the PBGC, public plans like Phoenix Employees' Retirement System rely on the full faith and credit of Arizona — meaning funding shortfalls flow through to state and local budgets rather than a federal insurance program. This information summarizes official Public Plans Database disclosures and is provided for research and educational purposes only. It is not financial, legal, or retirement-planning advice; active and retired members with specific benefit questions should consult their plan administrator directly.

Membership

8,407
Active Members
7,986
Retirees
17,542
Total Members

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Phoenix Employees' Retirement System fully funded?

Phoenix Employees' Retirement System has a funded ratio of 71.6% as of FY2023, earning a health grade of C. A funded ratio of 100% means the plan has enough assets to cover all projected liabilities. Ratios above 80% are generally considered adequately funded; ratios below 60% indicate significant underfunding and risk to future benefits.

What happens if Phoenix Employees' Retirement System runs out of money?

Public pension plans like Phoenix Employees' Retirement System are backed by the sponsoring government entity — in this case Arizona. If a plan's assets are insufficient, the state or local government is typically required to make up the difference through increased contributions, benefit adjustments, or tax measures. Unlike private pensions, public pensions are not insured by the PBGC, but they do carry the full faith and credit of the sponsoring government.

What does a funded ratio of 71.6% mean?

A funded ratio of 71.6% means that Phoenix Employees' Retirement System currently has assets equal to 71.6% of its projected benefit obligations. The unfunded liability — the gap between assets and liabilities — stands at $1.34B. This represents a moderate funding gap that requires ongoing monitoring.

How does Phoenix Employees' Retirement System compare to other public pensions?

Phoenix Employees' Retirement System is a General State plan in Arizona serving 17,542 members. Nationally, the average funded ratio for public pension plans tracked by the Public Plans Database is approximately 72–75%. Phoenix Employees' Retirement System's funded ratio of 71.6% places it near the national average.

How many members does Phoenix Employees' Retirement System have?

Phoenix Employees' Retirement System covers 17,542 total members, including 8,407 active employees and 7,986 retirees currently receiving benefits. The ratio of active members to retirees is a key indicator of plan sustainability — when the number of retirees grows relative to active contributors, funding pressure increases.

What is the ARC payment percentage for Phoenix Employees' Retirement System?

Phoenix Employees' Retirement System pays 12.7% of its Annual Required Contribution (ARC). Consistently underpaying the ARC accelerates the growth of unfunded liabilities and places future benefits at greater risk. Employer contribution patterns are tracked annually in the Public Plans Database.

Related

Data sourced from official Public Plans Database and actuarial valuations from federal and state pension systems. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by Kiznis Studio Editorial

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the Public Plans Database (PPD). Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.

All federal data sources used on this page