Plan
Texas Municipal Retirement System
State
Texas
Funded Ratio
64.9%
Assets
$39.49B
Members
252,394.797
Health Grade: C — Underfunded — significant gap between assets and liabilities
FY2023 data Grade C Public Plans Database

Texas Municipal Retirement System

Funded ratio, unfunded liability, member counts, ARC coverage, and 23-year financial history for Texas Municipal Retirement System — sourced from the Public Plans Database (Boston College CRR) and cross-checked against actuarial valuations.

Funded Ratio: 64.9% (Under-funded) Texas Municipal Retirement System funded ratio compared to national public pension benchmark. FUNDED RATIO 64.9% Under-funded Nat'l avg 73.5% 0% 60 70 80 100% Healthy > 80% · At-risk 70-80% · Critical < 60%
Texas Municipal Retirement System funded ratio is 64.9 percent — classified as Under-funded. National public-pension benchmark is 73.5 percent.
C
Financial Health Grade
Underfunded — significant gap between assets and liabilities

Funded Ratio

64.9%

actuarial assets / liabilities

Unfunded Liability

$21.37B

actuarial shortfall

Total Members

252,394.797

active + retired + vested

1-Year Return

8.1%

net investment return

0.2pp vs 5-yr avg

5-Year Avg Return

7.9%

annualized, net of fees

ARC Payment

33.1%

of actuarially required contribution

How Texas Municipal Retirement System Funded Ratio Compares

Plan Funded Ratio 64.9%
National avg

A ratio of 64.9% compared against the national public-pension average of 73.5%.

Healthy Threshold

Plans above 80% are generally considered adequately funded by NASRA standards.

Participant Composition

Participants: 124.5K active, 84.2K retired, 0 separated Plan participant breakdown showing active workers, retirees, and separated-vested members. PARTICIPANT MIX 252.4K total members 49% 33% Active 124.5K Retired 84.2K Separated 0 Active-to-Retiree 1.48 · Transitioning
Plan participant breakdown: 124.5K active workers, 84.2K retirees, 0 separated-vested members. Sustainability rating: Transitioning.

The active-to-retiree ratio is a leading indicator of long-term plan sustainability — plans with more retirees than active contributors face mounting cash-flow pressure as benefit payments outpace incoming contributions.

Investment Policy Mix

Asset Allocation: 55% equity, 25% fixed income, 17% alternatives Texas Municipal Retirement System investment policy mix as reported in Form 5500 Schedule H disclosures. ASSET ALLOCATION $39.5B market assets · Form 5500 Schedule H 55% 25% 17% Equity 55.0% Fixed Inc. 25.0% Alternatives 17.0% Cash 3.0% Investment Stance: Growth-Tilted · Equity + Alts 72%
Texas Municipal Retirement System asset allocation: 55% equity, 25% fixed income, 17% alternatives, 3% cash. Investment stance: Growth-Tilted.

Public pension plans report their asset allocation in Form 5500 Schedule H Part I disclosures. Equity-heavy mixes capture market upside but introduce volatility; fixed-income tilts protect funded status during downturns at the cost of long-run return.

Historical Funded Ratio

Year Funded Ratio
2024 64.9%
2023 63.7%
2022 61.7%
2021 59.6%
2020 59.2%
2019 58.0%
2018 56.4%
2017 56.3%
2016 57.3%
2015 60.5%
2014 62.0%
2013 63.8%
2012 66.3%
2011 69.1%
2010 75.1%
2009 79.2%
2008 86.0%
2007 85.8%
2006 81.2%
2005 83.6%

What the Data Says About Texas Municipal Retirement System

Texas Municipal Retirement System reports a funded ratio of 64.9% as of fiscal year 2023, earning a financial health grade of C in the Public Plans Database. The plan holds $39.49B in market assets against an unfunded liability of $21.37B. As a Municipal plan operating under Texas sponsorship, it covers 252,394.797 members (124,493 active contributors, 84,155 retirees drawing benefits). These figures aggregate from Form 5500 filings submitted to the Department of Labor and actuarial valuations reported through NASRA.

A funded ratio in the 60–80% range indicates moderate underfunding that falls near the national average of 72–75% but leaves the plan exposed to market downturns and demographic shifts. Employer contributions covered 33.1% of the Annual Required Contribution in the most recent reporting cycle, while the plan posted a 5-year average investment return of 7.9%. The relationship between contribution adequacy and investment performance determines whether the unfunded liability narrows or expands year over year.

For Texas taxpayers and plan members, the $21.37B unfunded gap represents the actuarial shortfall that must eventually be closed through a combination of contributions, investment returns, or benefit modifications. Unlike private-sector pensions governed by ERISA and backstopped by the PBGC, public plans like Texas Municipal Retirement System rely on the full faith and credit of Texas — meaning funding shortfalls flow through to state and local budgets rather than a federal insurance program. This information summarizes official Public Plans Database disclosures and is provided for research and educational purposes only. It is not financial, legal, or retirement-planning advice; active and retired members with specific benefit questions should consult their plan administrator directly.

Membership

124,493
Active Members
84,155
Retirees
252,394.797
Total Members

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Texas Municipal Retirement System fully funded?

Texas Municipal Retirement System has a funded ratio of 64.9% as of FY2023, earning a health grade of C. A funded ratio of 100% means the plan has enough assets to cover all projected liabilities. Ratios above 80% are generally considered adequately funded; ratios below 60% indicate significant underfunding and risk to future benefits.

What happens if Texas Municipal Retirement System runs out of money?

Public pension plans like Texas Municipal Retirement System are backed by the sponsoring government entity — in this case Texas. If a plan's assets are insufficient, the state or local government is typically required to make up the difference through increased contributions, benefit adjustments, or tax measures. Unlike private pensions, public pensions are not insured by the PBGC, but they do carry the full faith and credit of the sponsoring government.

What does a funded ratio of 64.9% mean?

A funded ratio of 64.9% means that Texas Municipal Retirement System currently has assets equal to 64.9% of its projected benefit obligations. The unfunded liability — the gap between assets and liabilities — stands at $21.37B. This represents a moderate funding gap that requires ongoing monitoring.

How does Texas Municipal Retirement System compare to other public pensions?

Texas Municipal Retirement System is a Municipal plan in Texas serving 252,394.797 members. Nationally, the average funded ratio for public pension plans tracked by the Public Plans Database is approximately 72–75%. Texas Municipal Retirement System's funded ratio of 64.9% places it below the national average, indicating elevated fiscal pressure.

How many members does Texas Municipal Retirement System have?

Texas Municipal Retirement System covers 252,394.797 total members, including 124,493 active employees and 84,155 retirees currently receiving benefits. The ratio of active members to retirees is a key indicator of plan sustainability — when the number of retirees grows relative to active contributors, funding pressure increases.

What is the ARC payment percentage for Texas Municipal Retirement System?

Texas Municipal Retirement System pays 33.1% of its Annual Required Contribution (ARC). Consistently underpaying the ARC accelerates the growth of unfunded liabilities and places future benefits at greater risk. Employer contribution patterns are tracked annually in the Public Plans Database.

Related

Data sourced from official Public Plans Database and actuarial valuations from federal and state pension systems. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by Kiznis Studio Editorial

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the Public Plans Database (PPD). Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.

All federal data sources used on this page