FY2024 source-reconciled actuarial data · Public Plans Database

Ohio State Teachers Retirement System

Funded ratio, unfunded liability, member counts, and 23-year financial history for Ohio State Teachers Retirement System, sourced from the Public Plans Database (Boston College CRR) and cross-checked against actuarial valuations.

By · · Ohio · Teachers Plan · Data through FY2024

Funded Ratio: 82.8% (Healthy) Ohio State Teachers Retirement System funded ratio compared to national public pension benchmark. FUNDED RATIO 82.8% Healthy Nat'l avg 75.49869791666667% 0% 60 70 80 100% Healthy > 80% · At-risk 70-80% · Critical < 60%
Ohio State Teachers Retirement System funded ratio is 82.8 percent, classified as Healthy. National public-pension benchmark is 75.49869791666667 percent.
Actuarial funded ratio
82.8%
Health grade
CReported funded ratio below full funding
Actuarial assets
$91.31B
Members
352,484

According to the Public Plans Database, compiled by the Boston College Center for Retirement Research, Ohio State Teachers Retirement System is one of 197 public pension plans tracked nationwide. The plan card reports source-reconciled actuarial figures through FY2024; the multi-year table includes only years whose reported ratio ties to its actuarial dollars. This site’s database copy was last loaded in July 2026. See our methodology for the full source and update cadence.

Sliding funded-ratio path

Ohio State Teachers Retirement System lost 8.4 points from FY2001 (91.2%) to FY2024 (82.8%) on the reconciled series.

Ohio State Teachers Retirement System on a sliding funded path

According to the Public Plans Database, Ohio State Teachers Retirement System lost 8.4 points on the reconciled series from FY2001 to FY2024, and now reports 82.8% (grade C).

82.8%
Funded · #159 of 192
C
Health grade
$18.94B
Actuarial unfunded liability
-8.4pp
FY2001→FY2024
Subscribe to funded-ratio changes (RSS)

Actuarial Unfunded Liability

$18.94B

Very large unfunded liability · source-reported UAAL

Total Members

352,484

active + retired + vested

1-Year Return

5.6%

Near assumed rate · net investment return

-3.0pp vs 5-yr avg

5-Year Avg Return

8.6%

Above assumed rate · annualized, net of fees

B
Composite Health Score
73/100
Ohio State Teachers Retirement System

Transparent derived index from public pension-plan filings, not an official rating. A 4-dimension composite (funded ratio, contribution discipline, 5-year investment return, unfunded burden), each scored against this dataset's own percentile distribution across 197 reporting plans. Not the same as the plan's headline funded-ratio grade above. See the exact dimensions, weights, and formula.

Funded Ratio B-
82.8%
Actuarial assets as a share of liabilities
Contribution Discipline A+
209.9%
Share of the actuarially required contribution actually paid
Investment Returns C
8.6%
5-year annualized investment return
Unfunded Burden C+
17.7%
Unfunded liability as a share of total obligations
How this score is calculated (benchmark table)
Dimension P10 P25 P50 P75 P90 Weight
Funded ratio (higher = better) 57.6% 67.2% 75.0% 87.0% 97.6% 0.35
Contribution discipline (ARC) (higher = better) 88.4% 100.0% 100.0% 104.1% 122.1% 0.25
5yr investment return (higher = better) 6.4% 7.5% 8.3% 9.1% 9.9% 0.20
Unfunded burden (lower = better) 2.0% 12.7% 25.0% 33.1% 42.4% 0.20

Percentiles computed across all 197 plans in this database with a reported value for that metric (2026-09-09). A dimension a plan does not report drops out of its composite, and that weight redistributes across the dimensions it does report, so thin reporting never silently lowers a score relative to a fully-reported peer.

Participant Composition

Participants: 175.0K active, 156.5K retired, 0 separated Plan participant breakdown showing active workers, retirees, and separated-vested members. PARTICIPANT MIX 352.5K total members 50% 44% Active 175.0K Retired 156.5K Separated 0 Active-to-Retiree 1.12 · Transitioning
Plan participant breakdown: 175.0K active workers, 156.5K retirees, 0 separated-vested members. Sustainability rating: Transitioning.

Investment Policy Mix

Asset Allocation: 55% equity, 25% fixed income, 17% alternatives Ohio State Teachers Retirement System investment policy mix as reported in its CAFR and actuarial valuation. ASSET ALLOCATION $87.9B market assets · CAFR / actuarial valuation 55% 25% 17% Equity 55.0% Fixed Inc. 25.0% Alternatives 17.0% Cash 3.0% Investment Stance: Growth-Tilted · Equity + Alts 72%
Ohio State Teachers Retirement System asset allocation: 55% equity, 25% fixed income, 17% alternatives, 3% cash. Investment stance: Growth-Tilted.

Funded ratio, 2001 to 2024

Assets as a share of the benefits already promised, one point per reported year. Down 8.4 points across the series. This is the multi-year table's series, so its last point can be a later year than the plan card above, which reports the plan's own latest valuation.

50%60%70%80%90%100% 200120042007201020132016201920222024 82.8%

What changed, FY2023 to FY2024

1.6 pts funded ratio

Ohio State Teachers Retirement System's funded ratio rose 1.6 points from FY2023 to FY2024, with assets contributing +3.5 points and the accrued liability contributing -1.9.

Funded ratio
81.3% → 82.8%
Actuarial assets
$87.58B → $91.31B (+4.3%)
Accrued liability
$107.78B → $110.25B (+2.3%)
Where the 1.6-point move came from
Assets
+3.5 pts
Accrued liability
-1.9 pts

Accrued liability is the source-reported value for benefits already promised. The two contributions are the move the ratio would have made on the prior year’s liability (assets) and the remainder (liability); they sum to the total by construction. Both years shown provide source-reconciled actuarial assets and liability, so neither figure rests on a ratio published on its own. Source: Public Plans Database (Boston College CRR / NASRA), loaded July 2026. See our funding-change board for how this plan’s move compares with the rest of the dataset.

Historical Actuarial Funding

Year Actuarial Ratio
2024 82.8%
2023 81.3%
2022 80.9%
2021 80.1%
2020 77.4%
2019 76.1%
2018 75.1%
2017 74.8%
2016 69.3%
2015 69.0%
2014 69.0%
2013 66.1%
2012 55.7%
2011 58.6%
2010 58.9%
2009 59.9%
2008 79.1%
2007 80.1%
2006 74.9%
2005 72.8%

What the Data Says About Ohio State Teachers Retirement System

Ohio State Teachers Retirement System ranks among the better-funded plans in the database, 7 points above the 75.5% national average across tracked plans. A 5-year average investment return of 8.6% factors into the plan's overall trajectory.

For Ohio taxpayers and plan members, the $18.94B source-reported actuarial unfunded liability is the shortfall this plan must close over time.

Where this data comes from + how funding gaps get resolved

These figures come from the Public Plans Database, a collaboration between the Boston College Center for Retirement Research and NASRA that compiles them from each plan's Comprehensive Annual Financial Reports (CAFRs) and actuarial valuations. The relationship between contribution adequacy and investment performance determines whether an unfunded liability narrows or expands year over year, and the gap itself is typically closed through some combination of higher contributions, investment returns, or benefit modifications. See our methodology for how public-pension funding differs from ERISA-backed private plans, and our disclaimer below before acting on this data.

Membership

175,032
Active Members
156,511
Retirees
352,484
Total Members

Plan Details

Plan Type
Teachers
State
Ohio
Market Assets
$87.90B
Source: Public Plans Database (PPD)
Boston College CRR / NASRA

Plans With a Similar Funded Ratio

The closest plans nationwide to Ohio State Teachers Retirement System's 62.9% funded ratio.

Showing 5 of 191 plans nationwide with a reported funded ratio.

Every figure on PlainPension is rendered directly from the Public Plans Database (Boston College Center for Retirement Research), no number is typed in by an editor. Ohio State Teachers Retirement System ranks #159 of 192 by funded ratio and #30 of 190 by membership. This information is for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice, consult a qualified professional before acting on it. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the typed corrections pathway, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of July 2026.