FY2023 source-reconciled actuarial data · Public Plans Database

Anchorage Police and Fire Retirement System

Anchorage Police and Fire Retirement System tracked in full: funded ratio, unfunded liability, membership, and investment returns across 23 years, sourced from the Public Plans Database (Boston College CRR) and verified against actuarial valuations.

By · · Alaska · Police & Fire Plan · Data through FY2023

Funded Ratio: 73.7% (At Risk) Anchorage Police and Fire Retirement System funded ratio compared to national public pension benchmark. FUNDED RATIO 73.7% At Risk Nat'l avg 75.49869791666667% 0% 60 70 80 100% Healthy > 80% · At-risk 70-80% · Critical < 60%
Anchorage Police and Fire Retirement System funded ratio is 73.7 percent, classified as At Risk. National public-pension benchmark is 75.49869791666667 percent.
Actuarial funded ratio
73.7%
Health grade
CReported funded ratio below full funding
Actuarial assets
$308M
Members
739

According to the Public Plans Database, compiled by the Boston College Center for Retirement Research, Anchorage Police and Fire Retirement System is one of 197 public pension plans tracked nationwide. The plan card reports source-reconciled actuarial figures through FY2023; the multi-year table includes only years whose reported ratio ties to its actuarial dollars. This site’s database copy was last loaded in July 2026. See our methodology for the full source and update cadence.

Smaller membership book

Anchorage Police and Fire Retirement System ranks #182 of 190 by reported members (739), bottom-third membership book among plans with a count.

Anchorage Police and Fire Retirement System in the smaller-membership third

According to the Public Plans Database, Anchorage Police and Fire Retirement System carries a bottom-third membership book (739, #182 of 190) with a 73.7% actuarial funded ratio (grade C).

73.7%
Funded · #129 of 192
C
Health grade
739
Members · #182 of 190
-15.6pp
FY2002→FY2023
Subscribe to funded-ratio changes (RSS)

Actuarial Unfunded Liability

$110M

Modest unfunded liability · source-reported UAAL

Total Members

739

active + retired + vested

1-Year Return

8.3%

Above assumed rate · net investment return

0.4pp vs 5-yr avg

5-Year Avg Return

7.9%

Above assumed rate · annualized, net of fees

F
Composite Health Score
34/100
Anchorage Police and Fire Retirement System

Transparent derived index from public pension-plan filings, not an official rating. A 4-dimension composite (funded ratio, contribution discipline, 5-year investment return, unfunded burden), each scored against this dataset's own percentile distribution across 197 reporting plans. Not the same as the plan's headline funded-ratio grade above. See the exact dimensions, weights, and formula.

Funded Ratio D
73.7%
Actuarial assets as a share of liabilities
Contribution Discipline F
0.0%
Share of the actuarially required contribution actually paid
Investment Returns F
7.9%
5-year annualized investment return
Unfunded Burden C-
24.5%
Unfunded liability as a share of total obligations
How this score is calculated (benchmark table)
Dimension P10 P25 P50 P75 P90 Weight
Funded ratio (higher = better) 57.6% 67.2% 75.0% 87.0% 97.6% 0.35
Contribution discipline (ARC) (higher = better) 88.4% 100.0% 100.0% 104.1% 122.1% 0.25
5yr investment return (higher = better) 6.4% 7.5% 8.3% 9.1% 9.9% 0.20
Unfunded burden (lower = better) 2.0% 12.7% 25.0% 33.1% 42.4% 0.20

Percentiles computed across all 197 plans in this database with a reported value for that metric (2026-09-09). A dimension a plan does not report drops out of its composite, and that weight redistributes across the dimensions it does report, so thin reporting never silently lowers a score relative to a fully-reported peer.

Participant Composition

Participants: 0 active, 739 retired, 0 separated Plan participant breakdown showing active workers, retirees, and separated-vested members. PARTICIPANT MIX 739 total members 100% Active 0 Retired 739 Separated 0 Active-to-Retiree 0.00 · Mature / At Risk
Plan participant breakdown: 0 active workers, 739 retirees, 0 separated-vested members. Sustainability rating: Mature / At Risk.

Investment Policy Mix

Asset Allocation: 55% equity, 25% fixed income, 17% alternatives Anchorage Police and Fire Retirement System investment policy mix as reported in its CAFR and actuarial valuation. ASSET ALLOCATION $340M market assets · CAFR / actuarial valuation 55% 25% 17% Equity 55.0% Fixed Inc. 25.0% Alternatives 17.0% Cash 3.0% Investment Stance: Growth-Tilted · Equity + Alts 72%
Anchorage Police and Fire Retirement System asset allocation: 55% equity, 25% fixed income, 17% alternatives, 3% cash. Investment stance: Growth-Tilted.

Funded ratio, 2002 to 2023

Assets as a share of the benefits already promised, one point per reported year. Down 15.6 points across the series. This is the multi-year table's series, so its last point can be a later year than the plan card above, which reports the plan's own latest valuation.

60%70%80%90%100%110%120% 20022005200820112014201720202023 73.7%

What changed, FY2022 to FY2023

2.7 pts funded ratio

Anchorage Police and Fire Retirement System's funded ratio rose 2.7 points from FY2022 to FY2023, with assets contributing +1.5 points and the accrued liability contributing +1.2.

Funded ratio
70.9% → 73.7%
Actuarial assets
$301M → $308M (+2.1%)
Accrued liability
$425M → $418M (-1.7%)
Where the 2.7-point move came from
Assets
+1.5 pts
Accrued liability
+1.2 pts

Accrued liability is the source-reported value for benefits already promised. The two contributions are the move the ratio would have made on the prior year’s liability (assets) and the remainder (liability); they sum to the total by construction. Both years shown provide source-reconciled actuarial assets and liability, so neither figure rests on a ratio published on its own. Source: Public Plans Database (Boston College CRR / NASRA), loaded July 2026. See our funding-change board for how this plan’s move compares with the rest of the dataset.

Historical Actuarial Funding

Year Actuarial Ratio
2023 73.7%
2022 70.9%
2021 85.7%
2020 78.6%
2019 77.4%
2018 83.4%
2017 94.7%
2016 80.4%
2015 79.5%
2014 86.0%
2013 88.8%
2012 81.4%
2011 76.6%
2010 85.1%
2009 79.2%
2008 74.5%
2007 112.1%
2006 112.1%
2005 106.5%
2004 106.7%

What the Data Says About Anchorage Police and Fire Retirement System

Anchorage Police and Fire Retirement System shows a comfortably above-average funding position, 2 points below the 75.5% national average across tracked plans. A 5-year average investment return of 7.9% factors into the plan's overall trajectory.

For Alaska taxpayers and plan members, the $110M source-reported actuarial unfunded liability is the shortfall this plan must close over time.

Where this data comes from + how funding gaps get resolved

These figures come from the Public Plans Database, a collaboration between the Boston College Center for Retirement Research and NASRA that compiles them from each plan's Comprehensive Annual Financial Reports (CAFRs) and actuarial valuations. The relationship between contribution adequacy and investment performance determines whether an unfunded liability narrows or expands year over year, and the gap itself is typically closed through some combination of higher contributions, investment returns, or benefit modifications. See our methodology for how public-pension funding differs from ERISA-backed private plans, and our disclaimer below before acting on this data.

Membership

739
Retirees
739
Total Members

Plan Details

Plan Type
Police & Fire
State
Alaska
Market Assets
$340M
Source: Public Plans Database (PPD)
Boston College CRR / NASRA

Plans With a Similar Funded Ratio

The closest plans nationwide to Anchorage Police and Fire Retirement System's 69.3% funded ratio.

Showing 5 of 191 plans nationwide with a reported funded ratio.

Every figure on PlainPension is rendered directly from the Public Plans Database (Boston College Center for Retirement Research), no number is typed in by an editor. Anchorage Police and Fire Retirement System ranks #129 of 192 by funded ratio and #182 of 190 by membership. This information is for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice, consult a qualified professional before acting on it. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the typed corrections pathway, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of July 2026.