Actuarial Unfunded Liability
$1.26B
Above-median unfunded liability · source-reported UAAL
FY2024 source-reconciled actuarial data · Public Plans Database
Baltimore Fire and Police Employees Retirement System
The Public Plans Database's 23-year record for Baltimore Fire and Police Employees Retirement System: funded ratio, unfunded liability, member counts, and investment returns, compiled by Boston College CRR and cross-checked against actuarial valuations.
By PlainPension · · Maryland · Police & Fire Plan · Data through FY2024
- Actuarial funded ratio
- 72.2%
- Health grade
- BReported funded ratio above the portfolio average range
- Actuarial assets
- $3.26B
- Members
- 9,969
According to the Public Plans Database, compiled by the Boston College Center for Retirement Research, Baltimore Fire and Police Employees Retirement System is one of 197 public pension plans tracked nationwide. The plan card reports source-reconciled actuarial figures through FY2024; the multi-year table includes only years whose reported ratio ties to its actuarial dollars. This site’s database copy was last loaded in July 2026. See our methodology for the full source and update cadence.
Higher funded-ratio band
Baltimore Fire and Police Employees Retirement System ranks #5 of 192 by source-reconciled actuarial funded ratio (72.2%), top-third among tracked public plans.
Baltimore Fire and Police Employees Retirement System in the higher-funded third
According to the Public Plans Database, Baltimore Fire and Police Employees Retirement System sits in the higher-funded third at 72.2% (grade B, #5 of 192) for FY2024, 3.3 points below the national public-pension average.
- 72.2%
- Funded · #5 of 192
- B
- Health grade
- $1.26B
- Actuarial unfunded liability
- -27.9pp
- FY2001→FY2024
Total Members
9,969
active + retired + vested
1-Year Return
13.6%
Strong return year · net investment return
6.1pp vs 5-yr avg
5-Year Avg Return
7.5%
Above assumed rate · annualized, net of fees
F
Composite Health Score
34/100
Baltimore Fire and Police Employees Retirement System
Transparent derived index from public pension-plan filings, not an official rating. A 4-dimension composite (funded ratio, contribution discipline, 5-year investment return, unfunded burden), each scored against this dataset's own percentile distribution across 197 reporting plans. Not the same as the plan's headline funded-ratio grade above. See the exact dimensions, weights, and formula.
Funded Ratio D
72.2%
Actuarial assets as a share of liabilities
Contribution Discipline F
100.0%
Share of the actuarially required contribution actually paid
Investment Returns F
7.5%
5-year annualized investment return
Unfunded Burden D
27.9%
Unfunded liability as a share of total obligations
How this score is calculated (benchmark table)
| Dimension | P10 | P25 | P50 | P75 | P90 | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Funded ratio (higher = better) | 57.6% | 67.2% | 75.0% | 87.0% | 97.6% | 0.35 |
| Contribution discipline (ARC) (higher = better) | 88.4% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 104.1% | 122.1% | 0.25 |
| 5yr investment return (higher = better) | 6.4% | 7.5% | 8.3% | 9.1% | 9.9% | 0.20 |
| Unfunded burden (lower = better) | 2.0% | 12.7% | 25.0% | 33.1% | 42.4% | 0.20 |
Percentiles computed across all 197 plans in this database with a reported value for that metric (2026-09-09). A dimension a plan does not report drops out of its composite, and that weight redistributes across the dimensions it does report, so thin reporting never silently lowers a score relative to a fully-reported peer.
Participant Composition
Investment Policy Mix
Funded ratio, 2001 to 2024
Assets as a share of the benefits already promised, one point per reported year. Down 27.9 points across the series. This is the multi-year table's series, so its last point can be a later year than the plan card above, which reports the plan's own latest valuation.
What changed, FY2023 to FY2024
0.4 pts funded ratioBaltimore Fire and Police Employees Retirement System's funded ratio was effectively unchanged from FY2023 to FY2024, moving 0.4 points, with assets and accrued liability growing at a similar pace.
Funded ratio
71.7% → 72.2%
Actuarial assets
$3.17B → $3.26B (+2.7%)
Accrued liability
$4.42B → $4.51B (+2.1%)
Where the 0.4-point move came from
- Assets
- +1.9 pts
- Accrued liability
- -1.5 pts
Accrued liability is the source-reported value for benefits already promised. The two contributions are the move the ratio would have made on the prior year’s liability (assets) and the remainder (liability); they sum to the total by construction. Both years shown provide source-reconciled actuarial assets and liability, so neither figure rests on a ratio published on its own. Source: Public Plans Database (Boston College CRR / NASRA), loaded July 2026. See our funding-change board for how this plan’s move compares with the rest of the dataset.
Historical Actuarial Funding
| Year | Actuarial Ratio |
|---|---|
| 2024 | 72.2% |
| 2023 | 71.7% |
| 2022 | 72.6% |
| 2021 | 71.6% |
| 2020 | 69.1% |
| 2019 | 69.8% |
| 2018 | 69.8% |
| 2017 | 71.1% |
| 2016 | 71.5% |
| 2015 | 72.8% |
| 2014 | 74.2% |
| 2013 | 76.6% |
| 2012 | 77.6% |
| 2011 | 82.0% |
| 2010 | 83.2% |
| 2009 | 87.3% |
| 2008 | 89.4% |
| 2007 | 91.9% |
| 2006 | 92.5% |
| 2005 | 96.2% |
What the Data Says About Baltimore Fire and Police Employees Retirement System
Baltimore Fire and Police Employees Retirement System shows a comfortably above-average funding position, 3 points below the 75.5% national average across tracked plans. A 5-year average investment return of 7.5% factors into the plan's overall trajectory.
For Maryland taxpayers and plan members, the $1.26B source-reported actuarial unfunded liability is the shortfall this plan must close over time.
Where this data comes from + how funding gaps get resolved
These figures come from the Public Plans Database, a collaboration between the Boston College Center for Retirement Research and NASRA that compiles them from each plan's Comprehensive Annual Financial Reports (CAFRs) and actuarial valuations. The relationship between contribution adequacy and investment performance determines whether an unfunded liability narrows or expands year over year, and the gap itself is typically closed through some combination of higher contributions, investment returns, or benefit modifications. See our methodology for how public-pension funding differs from ERISA-backed private plans, and our disclaimer below before acting on this data.
Membership
3,482
Active Members
6,487
Retirees
9,969
Total Members
Plan Details
- Plan Type
- Police & Fire
- State
- Maryland
- Market Assets
- $3.24B
Source: Public Plans Database (PPD)
Boston College CRR / NASRA
Boston College CRR / NASRA
Plans With a Similar Funded Ratio
The closest plans nationwide to Baltimore Fire and Police Employees Retirement System's 103.0% funded ratio.
Showing 5 of 191 plans nationwide with a reported funded ratio.
Other Maryland Plans
- Montgomery County Employees Retirement System 83.9%
- Maryland State Retirement and Pension System 79.9%
- Baltimore City Employees 66.9%
Read with this plan
Every figure on PlainPension is rendered directly from the Public Plans Database (Boston College Center for Retirement Research), no number is typed in by an editor. Baltimore Fire and Police Employees Retirement System ranks #5 of 192 by funded ratio and #141 of 190 by membership. This information is for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice, consult a qualified professional before acting on it. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the typed corrections pathway, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of July 2026.