FY2023 source-reconciled actuarial data · Public Plans Database

New York City Employees Retirement System

A full financial snapshot of New York City Employees Retirement System: funded ratio, unfunded liability, member counts, and investment returns, drawn from 23 years of history in the Public Plans Database (Boston College CRR) and verified against actuarial valuations.

By · · New York · General State Plan · Data through FY2023

Funded Ratio: 82.2% (Healthy) New York City Employees Retirement System funded ratio compared to national public pension benchmark. FUNDED RATIO 82.2% Healthy Nat'l avg 75.49869791666667% 0% 60 70 80 100% Healthy > 80% · At-risk 70-80% · Critical < 60%
New York City Employees Retirement System funded ratio is 82.2 percent, classified as Healthy. National public-pension benchmark is 75.49869791666667 percent.
Actuarial funded ratio
82.2%
Health grade
BReported funded ratio above the portfolio average range
Actuarial assets
$83.57B
Members
374,911

According to the Public Plans Database, compiled by the Boston College Center for Retirement Research, New York City Employees Retirement System is one of 197 public pension plans tracked nationwide. The plan card reports source-reconciled actuarial figures through FY2023; the multi-year table includes only years whose reported ratio ties to its actuarial dollars. This site’s database copy was last loaded in July 2026. See our methodology for the full source and update cadence.

Sliding funded-ratio path

New York City Employees Retirement System lost 12.3 points from FY2004 (94.5%) to FY2023 (82.2%) on the reconciled series.

New York City Employees Retirement System on a sliding funded path

According to the Public Plans Database, New York City Employees Retirement System lost 12.3 points on the reconciled series from FY2004 to FY2023, and now reports 82.2% (grade B).

82.2%
Funded · #62 of 192
B
Health grade
$18.14B
Actuarial unfunded liability
-12.3pp
FY2004→FY2023
Subscribe to funded-ratio changes (RSS)

Actuarial Unfunded Liability

$18.14B

Very large unfunded liability · source-reported UAAL

Total Members

374,911

active + retired + vested

1-Year Return

8.2%

Above assumed rate · net investment return

0.2pp vs 5-yr avg

5-Year Avg Return

8.0%

Above assumed rate · annualized, net of fees

C-
Composite Health Score
50/100
New York City Employees Retirement System

Transparent derived index from public pension-plan filings, not an official rating. A 4-dimension composite (funded ratio, contribution discipline, 5-year investment return, unfunded burden), each scored against this dataset's own percentile distribution across 197 reporting plans. Not the same as the plan's headline funded-ratio grade above. See the exact dimensions, weights, and formula.

Funded Ratio C+
82.2%
Actuarial assets as a share of liabilities
Contribution Discipline F
100.0%
Share of the actuarially required contribution actually paid
Investment Returns F
8.0%
5-year annualized investment return
Unfunded Burden C+
18.2%
Unfunded liability as a share of total obligations
How this score is calculated (benchmark table)
Dimension P10 P25 P50 P75 P90 Weight
Funded ratio (higher = better) 57.6% 67.2% 75.0% 87.0% 97.6% 0.35
Contribution discipline (ARC) (higher = better) 88.4% 100.0% 100.0% 104.1% 122.1% 0.25
5yr investment return (higher = better) 6.4% 7.5% 8.3% 9.1% 9.9% 0.20
Unfunded burden (lower = better) 2.0% 12.7% 25.0% 33.1% 42.4% 0.20

Percentiles computed across all 197 plans in this database with a reported value for that metric (2026-09-09). A dimension a plan does not report drops out of its composite, and that weight redistributes across the dimensions it does report, so thin reporting never silently lowers a score relative to a fully-reported peer.

Participant Composition

Participants: 179.6K active, 166.6K retired, 0 separated Plan participant breakdown showing active workers, retirees, and separated-vested members. PARTICIPANT MIX 374.9K total members 48% 44% Active 179.6K Retired 166.6K Separated 0 Active-to-Retiree 1.08 · Transitioning
Plan participant breakdown: 179.6K active workers, 166.6K retirees, 0 separated-vested members. Sustainability rating: Transitioning.

Investment Policy Mix

Asset Allocation: 55% equity, 25% fixed income, 17% alternatives New York City Employees Retirement System investment policy mix as reported in its CAFR and actuarial valuation. ASSET ALLOCATION $81.4B market assets · CAFR / actuarial valuation 55% 25% 17% Equity 55.0% Fixed Inc. 25.0% Alternatives 17.0% Cash 3.0% Investment Stance: Growth-Tilted · Equity + Alts 72%
New York City Employees Retirement System asset allocation: 55% equity, 25% fixed income, 17% alternatives, 3% cash. Investment stance: Growth-Tilted.

Funded ratio, 2004 to 2023

Assets as a share of the benefits already promised, one point per reported year. Down 12.3 points across the series. This is the multi-year table's series, so its last point can be a later year than the plan card above, which reports the plan's own latest valuation.

60%70%80%90%100% 2004200720102014201720202023 82.2%

What changed, FY2022 to FY2023

0.3 pts funded ratio

New York City Employees Retirement System's funded ratio was effectively unchanged from FY2022 to FY2023, moving 0.3 points, with assets and accrued liability growing at a similar pace.

Funded ratio
82.5% → 82.2%
Actuarial assets
$80.65B → $83.57B (+3.6%)
Accrued liability
$97.77B → $101.71B (+4.0%)
Where the 0.3-point move came from
Assets
+3.0 pts
Accrued liability
-3.3 pts

Accrued liability is the source-reported value for benefits already promised. The two contributions are the move the ratio would have made on the prior year’s liability (assets) and the remainder (liability); they sum to the total by construction. Both years shown provide source-reconciled actuarial assets and liability, so neither figure rests on a ratio published on its own. Source: Public Plans Database (Boston College CRR / NASRA), loaded July 2026. See our funding-change board for how this plan’s move compares with the rest of the dataset.

Historical Actuarial Funding

Year Actuarial Ratio
2023 82.2%
2022 82.5%
2021 81.5%
2020 78.1%
2019 76.8%
2018 74.1%
2017 72.2%
2016 71.5%
2015 69.9%
2014 67.9%
2012 66.3%
2011 65.0%
2010 64.2%
2009 78.6%
2008 79.7%
2007 79.0%
2006 82.3%
2005 88.4%
2004 94.5%

What the Data Says About New York City Employees Retirement System

New York City Employees Retirement System ranks among the better-funded plans in the database, 7 points above the 75.5% national average across tracked plans. A 5-year average investment return of 8.0% factors into the plan's overall trajectory.

For New York taxpayers and plan members, the $18.14B source-reported actuarial unfunded liability is the shortfall this plan must close over time.

Where this data comes from + how funding gaps get resolved

These figures come from the Public Plans Database, a collaboration between the Boston College Center for Retirement Research and NASRA that compiles them from each plan's Comprehensive Annual Financial Reports (CAFRs) and actuarial valuations. The relationship between contribution adequacy and investment performance determines whether an unfunded liability narrows or expands year over year, and the gap itself is typically closed through some combination of higher contributions, investment returns, or benefit modifications. See our methodology for how public-pension funding differs from ERISA-backed private plans, and our disclaimer below before acting on this data.

Membership

179,596
Active Members
166,631
Retirees
374,911
Total Members

Plan Details

Plan Type
General State
State
New York
Market Assets
$81.43B
Source: Public Plans Database (PPD)
Boston College CRR / NASRA

Plans With a Similar Funded Ratio

The closest plans nationwide to New York City Employees Retirement System's 82.2% funded ratio.

Showing 5 of 191 plans nationwide with a reported funded ratio.

Every figure on PlainPension is rendered directly from the Public Plans Database (Boston College Center for Retirement Research), no number is typed in by an editor. New York City Employees Retirement System ranks #62 of 192 by funded ratio and #28 of 190 by membership. This information is for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice, consult a qualified professional before acting on it. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the typed corrections pathway, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of July 2026.