Actuarial Unfunded Liability
$12.39B
Large unfunded liability · source-reported UAAL
FY2023 source-reconciled actuarial data · Public Plans Database
New York City Teachers Retirement System
Drawing on 23 years of Public Plans Database history (Boston College CRR), this page covers New York City Teachers Retirement System's funded ratio, unfunded liability, member counts, and investment returns, cross-checked against actuarial valuations.
By PlainPension · · New York · Teachers Plan · Data through FY2023
- Actuarial funded ratio
- 85.4%
- Health grade
- CReported funded ratio below full funding
- Actuarial assets
- $72.19B
- Members
- 228,336
According to the Public Plans Database, compiled by the Boston College Center for Retirement Research, New York City Teachers Retirement System is one of 197 public pension plans tracked nationwide. The plan card reports source-reconciled actuarial figures through FY2023; the multi-year table includes only years whose reported ratio ties to its actuarial dollars. This site’s database copy was last loaded in July 2026. See our methodology for the full source and update cadence.
Sliding funded-ratio path
New York City Teachers Retirement System lost 12.6 points from FY2001 (98.0%) to FY2023 (85.4%) on the reconciled series.
New York City Teachers Retirement System on a sliding funded path
According to the Public Plans Database, New York City Teachers Retirement System lost 12.6 points on the reconciled series from FY2001 to FY2023, and now reports 85.4% (grade C).
- 85.4%
- Funded · #80 of 192
- C
- Health grade
- $12.39B
- Actuarial unfunded liability
- -12.6pp
- FY2001→FY2023
Total Members
228,336
active + retired + vested
1-Year Return
8.9%
Above assumed rate · net investment return
-1.0pp vs 5-yr avg
5-Year Avg Return
9.9%
Above assumed rate · annualized, net of fees
C+
Composite Health Score
63/100
New York City Teachers Retirement System
Transparent derived index from public pension-plan filings, not an official rating. A 4-dimension composite (funded ratio, contribution discipline, 5-year investment return, unfunded burden), each scored against this dataset's own percentile distribution across 197 reporting plans. Not the same as the plan's headline funded-ratio grade above. See the exact dimensions, weights, and formula.
Funded Ratio B
85.4%
Actuarial assets as a share of liabilities
Contribution Discipline F
100.0%
Share of the actuarially required contribution actually paid
Investment Returns A+
9.9%
5-year annualized investment return
Unfunded Burden B-
15.4%
Unfunded liability as a share of total obligations
How this score is calculated (benchmark table)
| Dimension | P10 | P25 | P50 | P75 | P90 | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Funded ratio (higher = better) | 57.6% | 67.2% | 75.0% | 87.0% | 97.6% | 0.35 |
| Contribution discipline (ARC) (higher = better) | 88.4% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 104.1% | 122.1% | 0.25 |
| 5yr investment return (higher = better) | 6.4% | 7.5% | 8.3% | 9.1% | 9.9% | 0.20 |
| Unfunded burden (lower = better) | 2.0% | 12.7% | 25.0% | 33.1% | 42.4% | 0.20 |
Percentiles computed across all 197 plans in this database with a reported value for that metric (2026-09-09). A dimension a plan does not report drops out of its composite, and that weight redistributes across the dimensions it does report, so thin reporting never silently lowers a score relative to a fully-reported peer.
Participant Composition
Investment Policy Mix
Funded ratio, 2001 to 2023
Assets as a share of the benefits already promised, one point per reported year. Down 12.6 points across the series. This is the multi-year table's series, so its last point can be a later year than the plan card above, which reports the plan's own latest valuation.
What changed, FY2022 to FY2023
0.2 pts funded ratioNew York City Teachers Retirement System's funded ratio was effectively unchanged from FY2022 to FY2023, moving 0.2 points, with assets and accrued liability growing at a similar pace.
Funded ratio
85.5% → 85.4%
Actuarial assets
$69.60B → $72.19B (+3.7%)
Accrued liability
$81.37B → $84.59B (+4.0%)
Where the 0.2-point move came from
- Assets
- +3.2 pts
- Accrued liability
- -3.4 pts
Accrued liability is the source-reported value for benefits already promised. The two contributions are the move the ratio would have made on the prior year’s liability (assets) and the remainder (liability); they sum to the total by construction. Both years shown provide source-reconciled actuarial assets and liability, so neither figure rests on a ratio published on its own. Source: Public Plans Database (Boston College CRR / NASRA), loaded July 2026. See our funding-change board for how this plan’s move compares with the rest of the dataset.
Historical Actuarial Funding
| Year | Actuarial Ratio |
|---|---|
| 2023 | 85.4% |
| 2022 | 85.5% |
| 2021 | 83.8% |
| 2020 | 82.8% |
| 2019 | 82.7% |
| 2018 | 69.3% |
| 2017 | 63.8% |
| 2016 | 58.6% |
| 2015 | 56.4% |
| 2014 | 57.7% |
| 2013 | 57.7% |
| 2012 | 57.6% |
| 2011 | 58.2% |
| 2010 | 58.9% |
| 2009 | 64.1% |
| 2008 | 65.2% |
| 2007 | 69.6% |
| 2006 | 71.8% |
| 2005 | 77.1% |
| 2004 | 81.1% |
What the Data Says About New York City Teachers Retirement System
New York City Teachers Retirement System ranks among the better-funded plans in the database, 10 points above the 75.5% national average across tracked plans. A 5-year average investment return of 9.9% factors into the plan's overall trajectory.
For New York taxpayers and plan members, the $12.39B source-reported actuarial unfunded liability is the shortfall this plan must close over time.
Where this data comes from + how funding gaps get resolved
These figures come from the Public Plans Database, a collaboration between the Boston College Center for Retirement Research and NASRA that compiles them from each plan's Comprehensive Annual Financial Reports (CAFRs) and actuarial valuations. The relationship between contribution adequacy and investment performance determines whether an unfunded liability narrows or expands year over year, and the gap itself is typically closed through some combination of higher contributions, investment returns, or benefit modifications. See our methodology for how public-pension funding differs from ERISA-backed private plans, and our disclaimer below before acting on this data.
Membership
123,211
Active Members
89,997
Retirees
228,336
Total Members
Plan Details
- Plan Type
- Teachers
- State
- New York
- Market Assets
- $67.93B
Source: Public Plans Database (PPD)
Boston College CRR / NASRA
Boston College CRR / NASRA
Plans With a Similar Funded Ratio
The closest plans nationwide to New York City Teachers Retirement System's 76.8% funded ratio.
Showing 5 of 191 plans nationwide with a reported funded ratio.
Other New York Plans
- New York City Educational 108.9%
- New York State Teachers Retirement System 98.6%
- New York City Fire 97.6%
- New York City Employees Retirement System 82.2%
- New York City Police 79.9%
Read with this plan
Every figure on PlainPension is rendered directly from the Public Plans Database (Boston College Center for Retirement Research), no number is typed in by an editor. New York City Teachers Retirement System ranks #80 of 192 by funded ratio and #43 of 190 by membership. This information is for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice, consult a qualified professional before acting on it. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the typed corrections pathway, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of July 2026.