Plan
Kansas City Missouri Employees' Retirement System
State
Missouri
Funded Ratio
76.0%
Assets
$1.16B
Members
6,033
Health Grade: C — Underfunded — significant gap between assets and liabilities
FY2023 data Grade C Public Plans Database

Kansas City Missouri Employees' Retirement System

Funded ratio, unfunded liability, member counts, ARC coverage, and 23-year financial history for Kansas City Missouri Employees' Retirement System — sourced from the Public Plans Database (Boston College CRR) and cross-checked against actuarial valuations.

Funded Ratio: 76.0% (At Risk) Kansas City Missouri Employees' Retirement System funded ratio compared to national public pension benchmark. FUNDED RATIO 76.0% At Risk Nat'l avg 73.5% 0% 60 70 80 100% Healthy > 80% · At-risk 70-80% · Critical < 60%
Kansas City Missouri Employees' Retirement System funded ratio is 76.0 percent — classified as At Risk. National public-pension benchmark is 73.5 percent.
C
Financial Health Grade
Underfunded — significant gap between assets and liabilities

Funded Ratio

76.0%

actuarial assets / liabilities

Unfunded Liability

$366M

actuarial shortfall

Total Members

6,033

active + retired + vested

1-Year Return

10.0%

net investment return

0.5pp vs 5-yr avg

5-Year Avg Return

9.5%

annualized, net of fees

ARC Payment

28.5%

of actuarially required contribution

How Kansas City Missouri Employees' Retirement System Funded Ratio Compares

Plan Funded Ratio 76.0%
National avg

A ratio of 76.0% compared against the national public-pension average of 73.5%.

Healthy Threshold

Plans above 80% are generally considered adequately funded by NASRA standards.

Participant Composition

Participants: 3.0K active, 2.8K retired, 0 separated Plan participant breakdown showing active workers, retirees, and separated-vested members. PARTICIPANT MIX 6.0K total members 50% 46% Active 3.0K Retired 2.8K Separated 0 Active-to-Retiree 1.08 · Transitioning
Plan participant breakdown: 3.0K active workers, 2.8K retirees, 0 separated-vested members. Sustainability rating: Transitioning.

The active-to-retiree ratio is a leading indicator of long-term plan sustainability — plans with more retirees than active contributors face mounting cash-flow pressure as benefit payments outpace incoming contributions.

Investment Policy Mix

Asset Allocation: 55% equity, 25% fixed income, 17% alternatives Kansas City Missouri Employees' Retirement System investment policy mix as reported in Form 5500 Schedule H disclosures. ASSET ALLOCATION $1.2B market assets · Form 5500 Schedule H 55% 25% 17% Equity 55.0% Fixed Inc. 25.0% Alternatives 17.0% Cash 3.0% Investment Stance: Growth-Tilted · Equity + Alts 72%
Kansas City Missouri Employees' Retirement System asset allocation: 55% equity, 25% fixed income, 17% alternatives, 3% cash. Investment stance: Growth-Tilted.

Public pension plans report their asset allocation in Form 5500 Schedule H Part I disclosures. Equity-heavy mixes capture market upside but introduce volatility; fixed-income tilts protect funded status during downturns at the cost of long-run return.

Historical Funded Ratio

Year Funded Ratio
2024 76.0%
2023 76.7%
2022 82.7%
2021 83.4%
2020 80.7%
2019 80.1%
2018 81.5%
2017 89.9%
2016 96.1%
2015 96.7%
2014 97.2%
2013 94.8%
2012 90.8%
2011 96.0%
2010 104.4%
2009 112.8%
2008 99.1%
2007 131.2%
2006 127.4%
2005 122.9%

What the Data Says About Kansas City Missouri Employees' Retirement System

Kansas City Missouri Employees' Retirement System reports a funded ratio of 76.0% as of fiscal year 2023, earning a financial health grade of C in the Public Plans Database. The plan holds $1.16B in market assets against an unfunded liability of $366M. As a General State plan operating under Missouri sponsorship, it covers 6,033 members (3,016 active contributors, 2,793 retirees drawing benefits). These figures aggregate from Form 5500 filings submitted to the Department of Labor and actuarial valuations reported through NASRA.

A funded ratio in the 60–80% range indicates moderate underfunding that falls near the national average of 72–75% but leaves the plan exposed to market downturns and demographic shifts. Employer contributions covered 28.5% of the Annual Required Contribution in the most recent reporting cycle, while the plan posted a 5-year average investment return of 9.5%. The relationship between contribution adequacy and investment performance determines whether the unfunded liability narrows or expands year over year.

For Missouri taxpayers and plan members, the $366M unfunded gap represents the actuarial shortfall that must eventually be closed through a combination of contributions, investment returns, or benefit modifications. Unlike private-sector pensions governed by ERISA and backstopped by the PBGC, public plans like Kansas City Missouri Employees' Retirement System rely on the full faith and credit of Missouri — meaning funding shortfalls flow through to state and local budgets rather than a federal insurance program. This information summarizes official Public Plans Database disclosures and is provided for research and educational purposes only. It is not financial, legal, or retirement-planning advice; active and retired members with specific benefit questions should consult their plan administrator directly.

Membership

3,016
Active Members
2,793
Retirees
6,033
Total Members

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Kansas City Missouri Employees' Retirement System fully funded?

Kansas City Missouri Employees' Retirement System has a funded ratio of 76.0% as of FY2023, earning a health grade of C. A funded ratio of 100% means the plan has enough assets to cover all projected liabilities. Ratios above 80% are generally considered adequately funded; ratios below 60% indicate significant underfunding and risk to future benefits.

What happens if Kansas City Missouri Employees' Retirement System runs out of money?

Public pension plans like Kansas City Missouri Employees' Retirement System are backed by the sponsoring government entity — in this case Missouri. If a plan's assets are insufficient, the state or local government is typically required to make up the difference through increased contributions, benefit adjustments, or tax measures. Unlike private pensions, public pensions are not insured by the PBGC, but they do carry the full faith and credit of the sponsoring government.

What does a funded ratio of 76.0% mean?

A funded ratio of 76.0% means that Kansas City Missouri Employees' Retirement System currently has assets equal to 76.0% of its projected benefit obligations. The unfunded liability — the gap between assets and liabilities — stands at $366M. This represents a moderate funding gap that requires ongoing monitoring.

How does Kansas City Missouri Employees' Retirement System compare to other public pensions?

Kansas City Missouri Employees' Retirement System is a General State plan in Missouri serving 6,033 members. Nationally, the average funded ratio for public pension plans tracked by the Public Plans Database is approximately 72–75%. Kansas City Missouri Employees' Retirement System's funded ratio of 76.0% places it near the national average.

How many members does Kansas City Missouri Employees' Retirement System have?

Kansas City Missouri Employees' Retirement System covers 6,033 total members, including 3,016 active employees and 2,793 retirees currently receiving benefits. The ratio of active members to retirees is a key indicator of plan sustainability — when the number of retirees grows relative to active contributors, funding pressure increases.

What is the ARC payment percentage for Kansas City Missouri Employees' Retirement System?

Kansas City Missouri Employees' Retirement System pays 28.5% of its Annual Required Contribution (ARC). Consistently underpaying the ARC accelerates the growth of unfunded liabilities and places future benefits at greater risk. Employer contribution patterns are tracked annually in the Public Plans Database.

Related

Data sourced from official Public Plans Database and actuarial valuations from federal and state pension systems. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by Kiznis Studio Editorial

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the Public Plans Database (PPD). Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.

All federal data sources used on this page