Actuarial Unfunded Liability
$174M
Modest unfunded liability · source-reported UAAL
FY2024 source-reconciled actuarial data · Public Plans Database
Pittsburgh Policemen's Relief and Pension Fund
Drawing on 23 years of Public Plans Database history (Boston College CRR), this page covers Pittsburgh Policemen's Relief and Pension Fund's funded ratio, unfunded liability, member counts, and investment returns, cross-checked against actuarial valuations.
By PlainPension · · Pennsylvania · Police & Fire Plan · Data through FY2024
- Actuarial funded ratio
- 69.9%
- Health grade
- DLower reported funded ratio in this dataset
- Actuarial assets
- $404M
- Members
- N/A
According to the Public Plans Database, compiled by the Boston College Center for Retirement Research, Pittsburgh Policemen's Relief and Pension Fund is one of 197 public pension plans tracked nationwide. The plan card reports source-reconciled actuarial figures through FY2024; the multi-year table includes only years whose reported ratio ties to its actuarial dollars. This site’s database copy was last loaded in July 2026. See our methodology for the full source and update cadence.
Lower funded-ratio band
Pittsburgh Policemen's Relief and Pension Fund ranks #180 of 192 by source-reconciled actuarial funded ratio (69.9%), bottom-third among tracked public plans.
Pittsburgh Policemen's Relief and Pension Fund in the lower-funded third
According to the Public Plans Database, Pittsburgh Policemen's Relief and Pension Fund sits in the lower-funded third at 69.9% (grade D, #180 of 192) for FY2024, 5.6 points below the national public-pension average.
- 69.9%
- Funded · #180 of 192
- D
- Health grade
- $174M
- Actuarial unfunded liability
- +37.0pp
- FY2002→FY2024
Total Members
N/A
active + retired + vested
1-Year Return
13.0%
Strong return year · net investment return
4.4pp vs 5-yr avg
5-Year Avg Return
8.5%
Above assumed rate · annualized, net of fees
F
Composite Health Score
39/100
Pittsburgh Policemen's Relief and Pension Fund
Transparent derived index from public pension-plan filings, not an official rating. A 4-dimension composite (funded ratio, contribution discipline, 5-year investment return, unfunded burden), each scored against this dataset's own percentile distribution across 197 reporting plans. Not the same as the plan's headline funded-ratio grade above. See the exact dimensions, weights, and formula.
Funded Ratio F
69.9%
Actuarial assets as a share of liabilities
Contribution Discipline N/A
N/A
Share of the actuarially required contribution actually paid
Investment Returns C
8.5%
5-year annualized investment return
Unfunded Burden F
32.0%
Unfunded liability as a share of total obligations
How this score is calculated (benchmark table)
| Dimension | P10 | P25 | P50 | P75 | P90 | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Funded ratio (higher = better) | 57.6% | 67.2% | 75.0% | 87.0% | 97.6% | 0.35 |
| Contribution discipline (ARC) (higher = better) | 88.4% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 104.1% | 122.1% | 0.25 |
| 5yr investment return (higher = better) | 6.4% | 7.5% | 8.3% | 9.1% | 9.9% | 0.20 |
| Unfunded burden (lower = better) | 2.0% | 12.7% | 25.0% | 33.1% | 42.4% | 0.20 |
Percentiles computed across all 197 plans in this database with a reported value for that metric (2026-09-09). A dimension a plan does not report drops out of its composite, and that weight redistributes across the dimensions it does report, so thin reporting never silently lowers a score relative to a fully-reported peer.
Investment Policy Mix
Funded ratio, 2002 to 2024
Assets as a share of the benefits already promised, one point per reported year. Up 37.0 points across the series. This is the multi-year table's series, so its last point can be a later year than the plan card above, which reports the plan's own latest valuation.
What changed, FY2022 to FY2024
0.5 pts funded ratioPittsburgh Policemen's Relief and Pension Fund's funded ratio fell 0.5 points from FY2022 to FY2024, with assets contributing +5.4 points and the accrued liability contributing -5.9.
Funded ratio
70.4% → 69.9%
Actuarial assets
$375M → $404M (+7.7%)
Accrued liability
$532M → $577M (+8.4%)
Where the 0.5-point move came from
- Assets
- +5.4 pts
- Accrued liability
- -5.9 pts
Accrued liability is the source-reported value for benefits already promised. The two contributions are the move the ratio would have made on the prior year’s liability (assets) and the remainder (liability); they sum to the total by construction. Both years shown provide source-reconciled actuarial assets and liability, so neither figure rests on a ratio published on its own. Source: Public Plans Database (Boston College CRR / NASRA), loaded July 2026. See our funding-change board for how this plan’s move compares with the rest of the dataset.
Historical Actuarial Funding
| Year | Actuarial Ratio |
|---|---|
| 2024 | 69.9% |
| 2022 | 70.4% |
| 2020 | 65.6% |
| 2018 | 55.2% |
| 2016 | 54.0% |
| 2014 | 55.5% |
| 2012 | 56.6% |
| 2010 | 32.6% |
| 2008 | 27.2% |
| 2006 | 32.5% |
| 2004 | 33.3% |
| 2002 | 32.9% |
What the Data Says About Pittsburgh Policemen's Relief and Pension Fund
Pittsburgh Policemen's Relief and Pension Fund is funded above the midpoint but still carries a real shortfall, 6 points below the 75.5% national average across tracked plans. A 5-year average investment return of 8.5% factors into the plan's overall trajectory.
For Pennsylvania taxpayers and plan members, the $174M source-reported actuarial unfunded liability is the shortfall this plan must close over time.
Where this data comes from + how funding gaps get resolved
These figures come from the Public Plans Database, a collaboration between the Boston College Center for Retirement Research and NASRA that compiles them from each plan's Comprehensive Annual Financial Reports (CAFRs) and actuarial valuations. The relationship between contribution adequacy and investment performance determines whether an unfunded liability narrows or expands year over year, and the gap itself is typically closed through some combination of higher contributions, investment returns, or benefit modifications. See our methodology for how public-pension funding differs from ERISA-backed private plans, and our disclaimer below before acting on this data.
Plan Details
- Plan Type
- Police & Fire
- State
- Pennsylvania
- Market Assets
- $369M
Source: Public Plans Database (PPD)
Boston College CRR / NASRA
Boston College CRR / NASRA
Plans With a Similar Funded Ratio
The closest plans nationwide to Pittsburgh Policemen's Relief and Pension Fund's 53.9% funded ratio.
Showing 5 of 191 plans nationwide with a reported funded ratio.
Other Pennsylvania Plans
- Pittsburgh Fire 94.9%
- Pennsylvania Public School Employees Retirement System 88.3%
- Philadelphia Municipal Retirement System 78.5%
- Pennsylvania Municipal Retirement System 73.0%
- Pittsburgh Municipal 68.7%
Read with this plan
Every figure on PlainPension is rendered directly from the Public Plans Database (Boston College Center for Retirement Research), no number is typed in by an editor. Pittsburgh Policemen's Relief and Pension Fund ranks #180 of 192 by funded ratio. This information is for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice, consult a qualified professional before acting on it. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the typed corrections pathway, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of July 2026.